DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20181666

A comparative study of nasal smear and nasal biopsy in the confirmation of the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in a tertiary hospital of Rohtas district, Bihar

Chandrakant Diwakar, Sujeet Kumar, Kumari Seema, Ahmad Nadeem Aslami, Bhaskar Alwa

Abstract


Background: Allergic rhinitis is an IgE mediated immunological response of nasal mucosa to air born allergens is characterized by watery nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, sneezing and itching in the nose. Objective of this study was to compare and determine the efficacy of nasal smear and nasal biopsy in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.

Methods: In this study of total number of patients were 100. These were divided in two group, test and control group and each group contain 50 cases. This study was performed in the period of April 2017 to March 2018 in the department of Otorhinolaryngology, Narayan Medical College and Hospital, Jamuhar, Sasaram, Bihar. Nasal Punch biopsy was taken from the inferior turbinate from the selected patient of allergic rhinitis under local anesthetic agent like 2% Xylocaine with adrenaline.  

Results: The mean age of the patient undergoing the study was 35.88±13.22 in the study group and 32.96±10.71 in the control group. In this study, sample are matched with p=0.228. Eosinophil in nasal smear is significantly more associated with cases with p<0.001. Mast cells in nasal smear is significantly more associated with cases with P=0.006.

Conclusions: Nasal biopsy is better than nasal smear in diagnosing eosinophils in case of allergic rhinitis but for diagnosing mast cells biopsy is not sensitive enough in compared to nasal smears. So nasal biopsy can be used as a diagnostic test for allergic rhinitis. 


Keywords


Allergic rhinitis, Nasal smear, Nasal biopsy, Serum IgE, Eosinophils, Mast cells

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shah SN. API Text Book of Medicine. 7th ed. Mumbai: Association of Physicians of India; 2003: 288.

Available at: http://www.actaclinica.kbsm.hr/arhiva/ Acta2004/Acta%201/011%20Baudoin. Accessed 10 December 2018.

Available at: http://www.pharmabiz.com/articale/ detnews.asp?articaleid=11147&Sectionid=42. Accessed 10 December 2018.

Available at: http://medind.nic.in/iac/tac/t06/i2/ iact06i2p90.pdf-2. Accessed 10 December 2018.

Jacob BJ, Snow JB, Jr. Otorhiolaryngology: Head and Neck surgery. 15th ed. U.S.A: Williams and Wilkins; 1996: 722.

D’Souza L. Homoeopathy and Immunology. A Thesis submitted in the British Institute of Homoeopathy. Available at: http://www.homeo pathy2health.com/immunology.pdf. Accessed on 3 February 2018.

Varney VA, Jacobson MR, Sudderick RM, Robinson DS, Irani AMA, Schwartz LB, et al. Immunohistolgy of the nasal mucosa following allergen-induced rhinitis: Identification of activated T lymphocytes, eosinnophils and neutrophils. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:170-6.

Chandra R, Aggarwal AK, Kohli GS, Jaiswal TS, Gupta KB. Comparative study of nasal smear and biopsy in patients of allergic rhinitis. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002;16:27-31.

Bakhshaeel M, Fereidouni M, Farzadnia M, Varasteh A-R. The Nasal smear for Eosinophils, Its Value, and Its relation to Nasal Mucosal Eosinophilia in allergic Rhinitis. Iranian J Otorhinol. 2010;22(60):73-8.

Lans DM, Alfano N, Rocklin R. Nasal eosinophilia in allergic & non allergic rhinitis usefulness of the nasal smear in the nasal smear and biophy in allergic rhinitis 31 diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Allerg Proceedings. 1989;10:275-80.