Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a study in a teaching hospital in Telangana

Authors

  • Harika Surapaneni Department of ENT, Mallareddy Medical College for Women, Hyderabad, India
  • Shalini Singh Sisodia Department of ENT, Mallareddy Medical College for Women, Hyderabad, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20160062

Keywords:

Chronic rhino sinusitis, Etiology, Polyps, Nasal discharge

Abstract

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis is one of the common problems in ENT Department which can be caused due to infections or anatomical blockage or allergy. We performed this study to assess the cause, clinical features and the effect of treatment on rhinosinusitis.

Methods: 60 patients of chronic sinusitis with symptoms persisting beyond three months, Nasal Endoscopic findings with Polyps/Discharge/edematous mucosa were included in the study. A detailed clinical history, with complete Ear, Nose, Throat, and Head and Neck examination, blood tests like complete blood picture, Blood sugar levels, ESR and Hepatitis profile. X ray of paranasal sinuses, (water’s view) and lateral view, Chest x-ray –PA View and CT scan of paranasal sinuses (axial and coronal section with 3mm cuts at OMC) was done for all patients. Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopic examination (DNE) for detection of polyps / discharge / edematous mucosa in middle meatus was also done for the patients where it was necessary. The patients were given medical or surgical treatment according to the symptom and followup was done for 3 months for all patients.  

Results: Over 75% of the patients had incidence of sinusitis in the age group of 16 – 45 years. The most common etiology was sinusitis caused by infections (26 – 44%) followed by anatomical obstruction (22 – 36%). Of the 22 anatomical obstruction the most common was Deviated nasal septum in 14 (62%) of the cases followed by 4 (19%) CB, 3 (15%) pradixical MT and 1 (4%) prominent aggernasi. The most common sign and symptom was headache and polypoidal changes observed in 36 patients each (60%), followed by nasal obstruction in 35 patients (50%). 12 (20%) of the patients were treated with polypectomy + FESS while 14 (23%) of them were treated with septoplasty + FESS. 34 (57%) were treated with only FESS.

Conclusions: Chronic sinusitis doesnot affect a particular age or sex and is more common among patietns with an upper respiratory tract infection. CT scan of the paranasal sinuses is the most useful tool in diagnosing the disease and FESS is the treatment of choice.

Author Biographies

Harika Surapaneni, Department of ENT, Mallareddy Medical College for Women, Hyderabad, India

Assistant Professor, Department of ENT

Shalini Singh Sisodia, Department of ENT, Mallareddy Medical College for Women, Hyderabad, India

Assistant professor,

Department of ENT,

References

Thomas M, Yawn B, Price D, Lund V, Mullol J. Wytske Fokkens on behalf of the European position paper on Rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis group; Prime care Resp J. 2008;17(2):79-89.

Lane AP, Kennedy DW. Sinusitis & polyposis; Ballenger’s Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery. 2003;16:760-87.

Shah AR, Salamone FN, Tami TA. Acute and chronic sinusitis; Current Diagnosis And Treatment: Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery;2nd edition; Edited by Anil K Lalwani. 273-281.

Scott Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery: Edited by: Michael Gleeson. 7th Edition; chapter 104,105,106,113.

Scott Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; Rhinology Edited by Ian S. Mackay and T. R. Bull.

Iseh KR, Makusidi MM, Aliyu D. Surgical management of chronic rhino sinusitis in North western Nigeria and challenges for the future. Niger J med. 2009;18(3):277-81.

Stallman JS, Lobo JN, Som PM. The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship of nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease. American Journal of neuroradiology. 2004;25:1613-8.

Dua K, Chopra H, Khurana AS, Munjal M. CT scan variations in chronic sinusitis. Indian journal Radiol imag. 2005;15(3):315–20.

Iseh KR, Makusidi MM. Rhinosinusitis; A retrospective analysis of clinical pattern and outcome in north western Nigeria Ann Afr med. 2010;9(1):20-6.

Nonoyama T, Majima Y, Arima S, Takeuchi K, Sakakura Y. Study on endoscopic sinus surgery management of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps. Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan. 2000;103(9):1001-6.

Zinreich SJ, Kennedy DW, Rosenbaum AE, Gayler BW, Kumar AJ, Stammberger H. Paranasal sinuses: CT imaging requirements for endoscopic surgery. Radiology. 1987;163(3):769-75.

Jones NS, Strobl A, Holland I. A study of the CT findings in 100 patients with rhinosinusitis and 100 controls. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1997;22(1):47-51.

Asruddin, Yadav SPS, Yadav RK, Singh J. Low dose CT in chronic sinusitis. Indian journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck surgery. 2000;52:17-21.

Bolger EW, Butzin CA, Parsons DS. Para nasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities – CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1991;101:56-64.

Jareoncharsri P, Thitadilok V, Bunnag C, Ungkanont K, Voraprayoon S, Tansuriyawong P. Nasal endoscopic findings in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 1999;17(4):261-7.

Maru YK, Gupta V. Anatomical variation of bone in sinonasal CT.Indian Journal of Otolaryngol and head and neck surgery. 2001;53:123-8.

Buljcik – cupic MM, Savovic SN, Jovicevic JC. Influence of anatomic variations of the structure of middle nasal meatus on sinonasal diseases. Med pregl. 2008;61(3-4):135-41.

Devaiah AK. Adult chronic rhinosinusitis; Diagnosis and Dilemmas; Otolaryngology clinics of North America: 2004; 37:243-52.

Blackwell DL, Collins JG, Coles R. Summary health statistics for US adults: National health interview survey. Vital health stat. 2002;10:205.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-07

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles