Comparative study between result of temporalis muscle fascia and tragal cartilage perichondrium as a graft material in type 1 tympanoplasty


  • Abhay Kumar Department of ENT, UPRIMS&R, Saifai, Etawah, U.P.
  • Prabhu Narayan Department of ENT, UPRIMS&R, Saifai, Etawah, U.P.
  • Prem Narain Department of ENT, UPRIMS&R, Saifai, Etawah, U.P.
  • Jaypal Singh Department of ENT, UPRIMS&R, Saifai, Etawah, U.P.
  • Prateek Kumar Porwal Department of ENT, UPRIMS&R, Saifai, Etawah, U.P.
  • Sanjay Sharma Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, GSVM, Kanpur, U.P.
  • Daya Shankar Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, UPUMS Saifai, Etawah, U.P.



Temporal fascia, Tragal perichondrium, Tympanoplasty


Background: Leading cause of deafness in India is chronic suppurative otitis media. Most common cause of TM perforation is chronic suppurative otitis media. With this background this study was to compare hearing results, as well as graft takes for commonly preferred reconstruction techniques of the TM (i.e., temporalis fascia vs. cartilage) in tympanoplasty.

Methods: The present study consists of 60 cases of C.S.O.M (TTD) which was divided into two groups with 30 cases in each group. In first group type1 tympanoplasty was done by Temporalis fascia technique. In second group type 1 tympanoplasty done by tragal cartilage with perichondrium technique. History and otoscopic examination along with pure tone audiometry was performed preoperatively. Postoperative hearing results and graft uptake were compared between two groups, all surgeries were performed through the post aural approach.  

Results: Graft uptake results are better with tragal cartilage with perichondrium technique. Hearing improved significantly in both groups. Though this was slightly better in TFT, but not significant statistically.

Conclusions: Graft uptake rates are better with the tragal cartilage with perichondrium technique in comparison of TFT and hearing results are almost equivalent with both techniques.


Zoellner F. The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol. 1955;695:67-9.

Wullstein HL. Functional operations in the middle ear with split-thickness skin graft. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1952;161:422-35.

Heermann H. Tympanic membrane plastic with temporal fascia. Hals Nas Ohren. 1960;9:136-9.

Shea JJ. Vein graft closure of eardrum perforations. J Laryn-gol Otol. 1960;74:358-62.

Preobrazhenski TB, Rugov AA. The employment of preserved duramater graft in tympanoplasty.Vestn Otorinolaringol. 1965;5:38-42.

Sheehy JL, Anderson RG. Myringoplasty. A review of 472 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980;89:331-4.

Buckingham RA. Fascia and perichondrium atrophy in tym-panoplasty and recurrent middle ear atelectasis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1992;101:755-8.

Duckert LG, Muller J, Makielski KH, Helms J. Compos-iteautograft “shield” reconstruction of remnant tympanic membranes. Am J Otol 1995;16:21-6.

Yamamoto E, Iwanaga M, Fukumoto M. Histologic study of homograft cartilage implanted in the middle ear. Otolaryn-gol Head Neck Surg. 1988;98:546-51.

Hamed M, Samir M, El Bigermy M. Fate of cartilage materi-al used in middle ear surgery light and electron microscopy study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1999;26:257-62.

Chhapola S, Matt I. Cartilage–Perichondrium: An Ideal Graft Material? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;64(3):208-213

Yegin Y, Celik M, Koc AK, Küfeciler L, Elbistanlı MS, Kayhan FT. Comparison of temporalis fascia muscle and full thickness cartilage grafts in type 1 pediatric tympanoplasties. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(6):695-701.

Couloigner V, Baculard F, El Bakkouri W, Viala P, Francois M, Narcy P, et al. Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty in Children. Ontol Neurotol. 2005;26:247-51.

Gierek T, Slaska-Kaspera A, Majzel K, KlimczakGotqb L. Results of Myringoplasty and Type I Tympanoplasty with the Use of Fascia, Cartilage and Perichondrium Grafts. Otolaryngologia Polska. 2004;3:529-33.

Jesic SD, Dimitrijevic MV, Nesic VS, Jotic AD, Slijepcevic NA. Temporalis fascia graft perforation and retraction after tympanoplasty for chronic tubotympanic otitis and attic retraction pockets: Factors associated with recurrence. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137:139-43.

Dornhoffer JL. Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(8);1094–9.

Borkowski G, Sudhoff H, Luckhaupt H. Autologous perichondrium-cartilage graft in the treatment of total or subtotal perforations of the tympanic membrane. Laryngo Rhino Otologie. 1999;78(2):68–72.

Neumann A, Schultz-Coulon HJ, Jahnke K. Type III tympanoplasty applying the palisade cartilage technique: a study of 61 cases. Otol Neurotol. 2003;24(1):33–7.

Indorewala S. Dimensional stability of free fascia grafts: clinical application. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(2):278–82.

Mundra RK, Sinha R, Agrawal R. Tympanoplasty in subtotal perforation with graft supported by a slice of cartilage: a study with near 100% results. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 65(3):1–5.






Original Research Articles