Temporal divergence in symptom relief after submucosal diathermy versus endoscopic partial inferior turbinectomy – a prospective randomized study in a central Indian tertiary care cohort

Harsh N. Joshi; Harsh Agrawal; Rahil Nidhan; Abhay K. Gupta

doi:10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20263381

Authors

Harsh N. Joshi Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India
Harsh Agrawal Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India
Rahil Nidhan Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India
Abhay K. Gupta Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20263381

Keywords:

Inferior turbinate hypertrophy, Submucosal diathermy, Endoscopic turbinectomy, Nasal obstruction, NOSE score

Abstract

Background: Inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH) is the commonest structural cause of chronic nasal obstruction. Submucosal diathermy (SMD) and endoscopic partial inferior turbinectomy (EPT) are both widely used, but their comparative outcome over time is incompletely characterized.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, single-centre study, 100 adults with bilateral grade II-IV ITH refractory to medical therapy were randomized to SMD (n=50) or EPT (n=50). The nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) score was recorded pre-operatively and at day 7, 1, 3 and 6 months; complications and operative time were recorded. t-tests and Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test were used; p<0.05 was taken as significant.

Results: Groups were comparable for baseline NOSE score (74.10±8.19 versus 75.14±9.57; p=0.56). Improvement was equivalent at Day 7 (p=0.72) and 1 month (p=0.25). A significant divergence favouring EPT emerged at 3 months (31.32±5.42 versus 22.50±4.72; p<0.0001) and consolidated at 6 months (33.92±5.98 versus 7.54±2.53; p<0.0001), a 54.22% versus 89.97% reduction from baseline. EPT had greater early morbidity, including bleeding in 76% versus 2% of patients at Day 3, but every complication was self-limiting. Operative time was shorter with SMD (18.6±3.4 versus 27.8±5.1 minutes; p<0.0001). No atrophic rhinitis or empty nose syndrome occurred.

Conclusions: SMD and EPT gave equivalent short-term relief, but outcomes diverged from three months onward: SMD relapsed while EPT produced durable, near-complete resolution at the cost of transient early morbidity. Technique selection should be individualized to the patient and the predominant component of hypertrophy.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Abhay K. Gupta, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India

Professor, Head of Department, Department of Otorhinolaryngology

References

Eccles R. A role for the autonomic nervous system in the control of nasal blood flow and the nasal airway. Allergy. 2000;55(1):1-15.

Berger G, Hammel I, Berger R, Avraham S, Ophir D. Histopathology of the inferior turbinate with compensatory hypertrophy in patients with deviated nasal septum. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(12):2100-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200012000-00024

Brunworth J, Holmes J, Sindwani R. Inferior turbinate hypertrophy: review and graduated approach to surgical management. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(5):411-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3912

Batra PS, Seiden AM, Smith TL. Surgical management of adult inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a systematic review of the evidence. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(9):1819-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20544

House HP. Submucous resection of the inferior turbinal bone. Laryngoscope. 1951;61(7):637-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-195107000-00005

Mabry RL. Inferior turbinoplasty: patient selection, technique, and long-term consequences. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;98(1):60-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019459988809800111

Warwick-Brown NP, Marks NJ. Turbinate surgery: how effective is it? A long-term assessment. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1987;49(6):314-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000275957

Joniau S, Wong I, Rajapaksa S, Carney SA, Wormald PJ. Long-term comparison between submucosal cauterization and powered reduction of the inferior turbinates. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(9):1612-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000227999.76713.d3

Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(2):157-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2003.09.016

Lukka VK, Kurien R, Varghese L, Rupa V. Endoscopic submucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal diathermy for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(3):1885-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1280-0

Passali D, Passali FM, Damiani V, Passali GC, Bellussi L. Treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(8):683-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940311200806

Fradis M, Malatskey S, Magamsa I, Golz A. Effect of submucosal diathermy in chronic nasal obstruction due to turbinate enlargement. Am J Otolaryngol. 2002;23(6):332-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/ajot.2002.126857

Camacho M, Kram YA, Craig FD, Song SA, Chang ET, Certal V, et al. Randomized Trials Comparing Inferior Turbinoplasty Techniques for Nasal Obstruction: A Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025;173(3):546-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1269

Elshipli NA, El-Sisi HE, El-Fattah AMA, Al-Saddeik MAEH. Outcome comparison of submucous resection versus combined submucous diathermy and outfracture for treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(10):3827-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06663-2

Fradis M, Golz A, Danino J, Gershinski M, Goldsher M, Gaitini L, et al. Inferior turbinectomy versus submucosal diathermy for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(11):1040-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940010901109

Abdullah B, Singh S. Surgical interventions for inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a comprehensive review of current techniques and technologies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073441

Shastri K, Gao Y, Davis SJ, Kimura KS, Patel PN, Stephan SJ, et al. Normative values of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022;24(5):361-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2021.0303

Lipan MJ, Most SP. Development of a severity classification system for subjective nasal obstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(5):358-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2013.344

Ziai H, Bonaparte JP. Determining a successful nasal airway surgery: calculation of the patient-centered minimum important difference. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;157(2):325-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817701719

Al-Zobair MA, Mahbub M, Zaman S, Mahmudul Haque M, Mannan N, Mahfuza A. Management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a comparative study between partial inferior turbinectomy and submucosal diathermy. Med Today. 2025;37(2):198-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v37i2.83167

Bhandarkar ND, Smith TL. Outcomes of surgery for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;18(1):49-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e328334d974

De Corso E, Bastanza G, Di Donfrancesco V, Guidi ML, Morelli Sbarra G, Passali GC, et al. Radiofrequency volumetric inferior turbinate reduction: long-term clinical results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016;36(3):199-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-964