A clinical study of cochlear implant electrode placement via posterior tympanotomy approach in cases with varying types of round window visibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20262378Keywords:
Cochlear implantation, Round window STH classification, Round window insertion, Cochleostomy insertionAbstract
Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) is an established intervention for severe to profound hearing loss not benefiting from hearing aids. Posterior tympanotomy is the standard surgical approach to access the basal turn of the cochlea for electrode insertion via the round window or cochleostomy. However, the visibility and accessibility of the Round window membrane (RWM) may vary depending on anatomical variations. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the Saint Thomas Hospital (STH) classification in assessing round window visibility and its relationship to the practical ease of electrode insertion.
Methods: This retrospective study analysed 511 cochlear implantations performed via the posterior tympanotomy approach in 476 children. The round window was classified according to the STH classification. The method of electrode insertion used in each case was documented and analysed.
Results: Type IIA round window was the most common variant, observed in 282 cases (55.2%), while Type III was the least common, occurring in 64 cases (12.5%). Direct round window insertion was feasible in all cases with Type I and Type IIA round windows. In 96 cases with Type IIB round window, an extended round window technique was required for electrode insertion. All 64 cases with Type III round window required cochleostomy due to inadequate round window access.
Conclusions: The study demonstrates the clinical utility of the STH classification in predicting the feasibility of round window electrode insertion during cochlear implantation. This classification can assist surgeons in determining the most appropriate method of electrode insertion based on intraoperative STH classification.
References
Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Cochlear Implants for Children with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(23):2380-7.
Aljazeeri I, Alturaiki S, Abdelsamad Y, Alzhrani F, Hagr A. Various approaches to the round window for cochlear implantation: a systematic review. J Laryngol Otol. 2023;137(10):1064-82.
Paprocki A, Biskup B, Kozłowska K, Kuniszyk A, Bien D, Niemczyk K. The topographical anatomy of the round window and related structures for the purpose of cochlear implant surgery. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2004;63(3):309-12.
Roland PS, Gstöttner W, Adunka O. Method for hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;16(2):93-100.
Adunka O, Unkelbach MH, MacK M, Hambek M, Gstoettner W, Kiefer J. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: A histologically controlled insertion study. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2004;124(7):807-12.
Leong AC, Jiang D, Agger A, Fitzgerald-O’Connor A. Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(4):1237-42.
Luers JC, Hüttenbrink KB, Beutner D. Surgical anatomy of the round window-Implications for cochlear implantation. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(2):417-24.
Proctor B, Bollobas B, Niparko JK. Anatomy of the round window niche. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1986;95(1):444-6.
Kataria T, Sharma S, Lakhawat RS, Grover M, Sharma S, Kanodia A, et al. A Study of Round Window and its Adjacent Anatomy to Guide the Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;75(1):163-9.
Panda NK, Kameswaran M, Patro SK, Saran S, Nayak G. Evaluation of round window accessibility for electrode insertion: Validation study from two centers. J Otolaryngol ENT Res. 2017;8(5):00263.
Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(8):1397-402.
Junaid M. Insertion of cochlear implant electrodes through round window membrane: its accessibility in pediatric population. Glob J Otolaryngol. 2020;23(2):556109.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
