DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20173137

Comparison of endoscopic underlay and microscopic underlay tympanoplasty: a prospective research at a tertiary care centre in Gujarat

Mohit Sinha, Narendra Hirani, Ajeet Kumar Khilnani

Abstract


Background: Tympanoplasty is an ever evolving surgery with myriad of approaches and tools. Use of endoscope is relatively new and there are few studies evaluating the use of endoscope via microscope because of a big learning curve in using one hand endoscopic technique despite it being minimally invasive.

Methods: This is a prospective study conducted from June 2016 to May 2017 with a sample size of 44 patients. The study included patients of Chronic Otitis Media (COM) of mucosal inactive type without any co-morbidities in which only Type-1 tympanoplasty was done. The patients were divided into endoscopic or microscopic group using simple random sampling and after taking written and informed consent. The patient’s details regarding audiometric, oto-endoscopic and nasal endoscopic evaluation were recorded. Intra operative findings, duration of surgery and post-operative pain scoring were recorded. The patients were followed up for 3 months and subjected to post-operative audiometry and patient satisfaction questionnaire. The groups were evaluated for graft take up and closure of air bone gap, post-operative complications and patient satisfaction. The results were analysed using descriptive statistics (mean and percentage) and CHISQ test.

Results: Graft was taken up in 21 patients (95%) in microscopic as opposed to 20 in endoscopic group (90%). Mean VAS scoring for pain was 2.5 in microscopic group on first post-operative day and 1.5 for the endoscopic group. The mean improvement in air bone gap post-surgery was 23.68 dB (SD=4.94) for microscopic group and 16.13 dB (SD=6.49) for endoscopic group.

Conclusions: Endoscopic tympanoplasty as a technique has a long learning curve. The results indicate that endoscopic technique is as efficacious as and less invasive than microscope surgery for doing tympanoplasty. 


Keywords


Chronic otitis media, Endoscopic tympanoplasty, Microscopic tympanoplasty, Overlay technique, Underlay technique

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wullstein H. Tympanoplasty: the fundamentals of the concept. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1978;3(4):431-5.

House H, House W, Tabb H, Wullstein H, Zollner F. Panel on myringoplasty methods. Arch Otolaryngol. 1963;78:296-304.

Shea JJ. Vein graft closure of ear drum perforation. J Laryngol Otol. 1960;74:358.

Mclaurin JW, Raggio TP, Tabb HG. A technique of tympanoplasty. Preservation of the bony canal wall. Use of vein grafts. Laryngoscope. 1961;71:116-30.

Tabb HG. Experience in transcanal and post auricular myringoplasty. Tran Pac Coast Oto Ophthalmol Soc Arnn Meet. 1968;52:121–5.

Thomassin JM, Duchon‑Doris JM, Emram B, Rud C, Conciatori J, Vilcoq P. Endoscopic ear surgery. Initial evaluation. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1990;107:564‑70.

El‑Guindy A. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol. 1992;106:493‑5.

Rosenberg SI, Silverstein H, Willcox TO, Gordon MA. Endoscopy in otology and neurotology. Am J Otol. 1994;15:168‑72.

Patel J, Aiyer R, Gajjar Y, Gupta R, Raval J, Suthar P. Endoscopic tympanoplasty vs microscopic tympanoplasty in tubotympanic SOM: A comparative study of 44 cases. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015;3:1953 7.

Harugop AS, Mudhol RS, Godhi RA. A comparative study of endoscope assisted myringoplasty and microscope assisted myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;60:298‑302.

De La Mcrovetto T, Fiz Melsio L, Martinez A. Myringoplasty in chronic simple otitis media; comparative study of underlay and overlay technique. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Esp. 2000;51(2):101–4.

Khan MM, Parab SR. Endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty: A two-handed technique using an endoscope holder. The Laryngoscope. 2015;126:1893–8.

Tarabichi M. Endoscopic transcanal middle ear surgery. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;62:6‑24.

Usami S, Iijima N, Fujita S, Takumi Y. Endoscopic‑assisted myringoplasty. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2001;63:287‑90.

Prasad SC, Giannuzzi A, Nahleh EA, Donato GD, Russo A, Sanna M. Is endoscopic ear surgery an alternative to the modified Bondy technique for limited epitympanic cholesteatoma? Euro Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2016;273:2533–40.

Sengupta A, Basak B, Ghosh D, Basu D, Adhikari D, Maity K. A Study on Outcome of Underlay, Overlay and Combined Techniques of Myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;64:63–6.

Shaikh AA, Shiraz MA, Salman O, Shaikh M, Rafi T. Outcome of tympanoplasty type 1 by underlay technique. JLUMHS. 2009;8(1):80-4.

Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty. Part II: the study. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:26–36.

Tseng CC, Lai MT, Wu CC, Yuan SP, Ding YF. Comparison of the efficacy of endoscopic tympanoplasty and microscopic tympanoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2016.

Doyle JP, Schleuning AJ, Echevarria J. Tympanoplasty: Should grafts be placed medial or lateral to the tympanic membrane? Laryngoscope. 1992;82:1425-30.

Glasscock ME, III Tympanic membrane grafting with fascia: overlay vs. undersurface technique. Laryngoscope. 1973;83:754–70.