Stroboscopy: an evolving tool for voice analysis in vocal cord pathologies

Sneha D. Rajput; Mittal J. Poriya

doi:10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20173265

Authors

Sneha D. Rajput Department of Otorhinolaryngology, S.C.L. Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Mittal J. Poriya Department of Otorhinolaryngology, S.C.L. Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20173265

Keywords:

Stroboscopy, Glottal configuration, Mucosal wave, Phase difference

Abstract

Background: Benign vocal fold disease, such as vocal polyp, vocal nodule, intracordal cyst or Reinke’s edema is one of the most common causes which deteriorate the voice. Since 1854 when Manuel Garcia first observed the movement of his own vocal cords using a laryngeal mirror and sunlight as the light source, a number of techniques for demonstrating laryngeal anatomy have evolved. Preoperative evaluation of these lesions initially by indirect laryngoscopy or direct rigid laryngoscopy, gave way to the use of transnasal flexible fibreoptic endoscopy in the eighties. The introduction of the video stroboscope into Otorhinolaryngology practice has revolutionized the assessment of vocal cord pathology.

Methods: The present study includes a 50 cases of subjects with complain of change of voice coming at department of E.N.T and Head and Neck surgery, at our hospital. A detailed history was taken following which a thorough examination of larynx using appropriate techniques were carried out. Further investigations were done as and when required.

Results: On stroboscopic examination patients were analyzed on four parameters like, symmetry, amplitude, periodicity and mucosal wave. Observations of periodicity and mucosal wave were significantly different in preoperative and post-operative analysis. Stroboscopic evaluation suggested that preoperatively 50% of the patient were having asymmetricity, decreased amplitude, aperiodicity and absent mucosal wave. On postoperative follow-up at 15 days and 2 months interval almost all the patients got all the parameters near normal.

Conclusions: It was observed that statistical significant difference in pre and postoperative findings of different parameters of voice evaluated using it. We can draw the probable conclusion that video stroboscope proved to be useful and reliable tool for evaluation of the patients with benign vocal cord pathologies as it reflects the change in the all the parameters of voice postoperatively most accurately and promptly.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Sneha D. Rajput, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, S.C.L. Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Department of ENT

Junior Resident

Mittal J. Poriya, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, S.C.L. Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

JUNIOR RESIDENT

DEPARTMENT OF ENT

References

Clerf LH. Manuel Gravia’s contribution in to laryngology. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1956:32;603-11.

A short history of laryngoscopy. Anthony Jahn and Andrew Blitzer. Log Phon Vocol. 1996;21:181-5.

Yoshida Y, Hirano M, Nakajima T. A videotape recording system for videostroboscopy.1979;30:1-5.

American Speech Language Hearing association. Training guidelines for laryngeal videoendoscopy/stroboscopy, 1998.

Gleeson MJ, Clarke RC. Scott Brown’s otolaryngology. Head and Neck surgery, 7th edition. 2008: 2196-2205.

Laryngeal evaluation. Indirect laryngoscopy to high speed imaging. In: Kendall KA, Leonard RJ. Thieme; 2010.

Krausert CR, Olszewski AE, Taylor LN, McMurray JS, Dailey SH, Jiang JJ. Mucosal wave measurement and visualization technique. J Voice. 2011:25(4);395-405.

Kaszuba SM, Garrett CG. Strobovideolaryngoscopy and Laboratory voice evaluation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007;40(5):991-6.

Patrik JP, Felix IC. Consistency of preoperative and intraoperative diagnosis of benign vocal fold lesions. J Voice. 2003;17(3):425-33.

Raymond H, Colton P. Stroboscopic signs associated with benign vocal fold lesions. J Voice. 1995;9:315-25.

Sheth M, Michael J. Management of dysphonic patients by otolaryngologists. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(2):289-94.

Baitha S, Raizada RM, Singh AKK, M. Puttewar M, Chaturvedi VN. Clinical profile of hoarsness of voice. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;54(1):14–8.

Printza A, Triaridis S, Themelis C, Constantinidis J. Stroboscopy for benign laryngeal pathology in evidence based health care. Hippokratia. 2012;16(4):324-8.

Shin YS, Chang JW, Yang SM, Wu HW, Cho MH, Kim CH. Persistent Dysphonia after Laryngo-microsurgery for Benign Vocal Fold Disease. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;6(3):166–70.

Fritzel B. Analysis of Longitudinal Phase Differences in Vocal-Fold Vibration Using Synchronous High-Speed Videoendoscopy and Electroglottography. J Voice. 2012;26(6):816–816.