The influence of reconstruction following hemiglossectomy on perioperative outcomes

Richa Nathan; Michelle Burmistrova; Ashar Ata; Neil Gildener-Leapman

doi:10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20252980

Authors

Richa Nathan Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, Unites States
Michelle Burmistrova Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, Unites States
Ashar Ata Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, United States
Neil Gildener-Leapman Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, Unites States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20252980

Keywords:

Hemiglossectomy, Free-flap reconstruction, Neck dissection, Perioperative outcomes, Quality improvement, Evidence-based medicine

Abstract

Background: Hemiglossectomy can be required for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) resection but can result in functional and aesthetic deficits. Flap reconstruction is employed to restore form and function following hemiglossectomy but has procedure specific complications.

Methods: Our study is a retrospective cohort study analyzing perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing hemiglossectomy with and without reconstruction using the American College of Surgeons' national surgical quality improvement project (ACS-NSQIP) database. We identified 866 hemiglossectomy patients from 2008-2022, 233 of these patients underwent flap reconstruction. Modified Poisson regression was used to assess the effect of flap reconstruction on the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Results: Patients who received reconstruction were 1.74 times more likely (95% CI: (1.31, 2.3) p<0.001) to have perioperative complications (pneumonia, ventilator use >48 hours, urinary tract infection, myocardial infarction, surgical site infections) and longer length of stay (10.71 vs. 3.67 days, p<0.001) compared to those without. American Society of Anesthesiology score (ASA) and neck dissection were found to be independent predictors of morbidity. In addition, the need for operative interventions like tracheostomy and neck dissection was more prevalent in the reconstruction group. The association was similar when limited to those who had concurrent neck dissection.

Conclusions: Higher rates of complications associated with flap reconstruction among hemiglossectomy patients underscore the importance of careful consideration and surgical planning in flap reconstruction following hemiglossectomy. Understanding the relationship between perioperative risk and long-term functional outcomes will inform surgical decision making.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ranganath K, Jalisi SM, Naples JG, Gomez ED. Comparing outcomes of radial forearm free flaps and anterolateral thigh free flaps in oral cavity reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2022;135:106214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106214

Stepan KO, Mazul AL, Larson J, Parth S, Jackson RS, Pipkorn P, et al. Changing Epidemiology of Oral Cavity Cancer in the United States. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;168(4):761-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998221098011

Younis PA, Davis S, Sweedan AO, ElSabbagh AM, Fernandes RP. Volumetric changes in post hemiglossectomy reconstruction with anterolateral thigh free flap versus radial forearm free flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;53(6):470-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2023.12.003

Chang WC, Chang CF, Cheng CM, Yang CY, Chen YW. Comparison of the hospitalization period after microvascular reconstruction flap in trismus patients: Free anterolateral thigh flap versus free forearm flap. Clin Oral Investigat. 2019;23(7):2951-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-02799-4

Cai YC, Li C, Zeng D, Zhou YQ, Sun RH, Shui CY, et al. Comparative analysis of radial forearm free flap and anterolateral thigh flap in tongue reconstruction after radical resection of tongue cancer. ORL. 2019;81(5-6):252-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000502151

Eisenstein S, Stringfield S, Holubar SD. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) to Perform Clinical Research in Colon and Rectal Surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32(1):41-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673353

Uwiera T, Seikaly H, Rieger J, Chau J, Harris JR. Functional outcomes after hemiglossectomy and reconstruction with a bilobed radial forearm free flap. J Otolaryngol. 2004;33(6):356-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2004.00356

Yi CR, Jeong WS, Oh TS, Koh KS, Choi JW. Analysis of Speech and Functional Outcomes in Tongue Reconstruction after Hemiglossectomy. J Reconstruction Microsurgery. 2020;36(7):507-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709493

Ji YB, Cho YH, Song CM, Youn HK, Jeong TK, Hee CA, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after resection of tongue cancer: determining the optimal reconstruction method. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(10):3751-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4683-8

Li X, Sun Q, Guo S. Functional Assessments in Patients Undergoing Radial Forearm Flap Following Hemiglossectomy. J Craniofacial Surg. 2016;27(2):e172-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002261

Gad ZS, El-Malt OA, El-Sakkary MAT, Abdal Aziz MM. Elective Neck Dissection for Management of Early- Stage Oral Tongue Cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(7):1797-803.

Surgeons ACO. ACS NSQIP. Participant list. Available at: http:// site.acsnsqip.org/participants/. Accessed on 25 August 2025.

de Melo GM, Ribeiro KDCB, Kowalski LP, Deheinzelin D. Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications in Oral Cancer and Their Prognostic Implications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):828-33.

Yin L, Liu Y, Pei M, Li J, Wu M, Jia Y. Laryngoscope8: Laryngeal image dataset and classification of laryngeal disease based on attention mechanism. Pattern Recognit Letters. 2021;150:207-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2021.06.034