Quick identification and preservation of facial nerve using only posterior belly of digastric muscle

Authors

  • Shuklima Sengupta Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Assam, India
  • Kripamoy Nath Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Assam, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3328-3230

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20250119

Keywords:

Facial nerve trunk, Posterior belly of digastric muscle, Superficial parotidectomy, Total parotidectomy

Abstract

Parotid glands are the largest salivary glands separated into two lobes by the neurovascular plane of the facial nerve. Superficial or total parotidectomy is considered the best therapeutic option for different Parotid lesions. There are various key indicators for locating the anatomical landmarks of the facial nerve in either anterograde or retrograde manner or using nerve monitoring, microscope, gamma probe etc. The Aim here is to promptly detect and preserve the facial nerve trunk and its terminal branches during parotid surgery with using only the posterior belly of the Digastric muscle aided with microscope. This is a one-year prospective observational study of 19 cases undergoing parotidectomy. The time taken to find the facial nerve trunk and its distance from the posterior belly of the digastric muscle were documented intraoperatively followed by post-surgery cranial nerve VII’ examinations. The “facial nerve” was satisfactorily preserved in 16 out of 19 (84.21%) cases with sole usage of the “posterior belly of the digastric muscle.” The mean time to identify the FNT was calculated as: 21.78 mins. The average distance of the FNT from the anterior border of the PBDM was estimated as 6.44mm. Prompt exposure of the PBDM, followed by locating the FNT just at a distance of 6.5 mm anteromedial to PBDM, can be done within 20-22 minutes, which is found to be the quickest and easiest method to identify and preserve the facial nerve with pes anserinus using PBDM as the robust indicator, preventing facial disfigurement and mental stress to the patient.

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Watkinson C, John S. Otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery. 8th Edition, head and neck surgery & plastic surgery. Boca Raton. CRC Press. 2018: 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429443558

de Ru JA, van Benthem PP, Bleys RL, Lubsen H, Hordijk GJ. Landmarks for parotid gland surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115(2):122-5.

Saha S, Pal S, Sengupta M, Chowdhury K, Saha VP, Mondal L. Identification of facial nerve during parotidectomy: a combined anatomical & surgical study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66(1):63-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-013-0669-z

Al-Qahtani KH, AlQahtani FM, Muqat MM, AlQahtani MS, Al-Qannass AM, Islam T, et al. A new landmark for the identification of the facial nerve during parotid surgery: A cadaver study. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020;5(4):689-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.431

Janes RM. The treatment of tumours of the salivary glands by radical excision. Can Med Assoc J. 1940;43(6):554-9.

Pereira JA, Merí A, Potau JM, Prats-Galino A, Sancho JJ, Sitges-Serra A. A simple method for safe identification of the facial nerve using palpable landmarks. Arch Surg. 2004;139(7):745-7; discussion 748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.7.745

de Ru JA, van Benthem PP, Bleys RL, Lubsen H, Hordijk GJ. Landmarks for parotid gland surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2001115(2):122-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215011907721

McCabe BF, Work WP. Parotidectomy with special reference to the facial nerve. Otolaryngol. 1968;4(3):37-53.

Lydiatt DD. Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(1):50-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.129.1.50

Stennert E, Wittekindt C, Klussmann JP, Arnold G, Guntinas-Lichius O. Recurrent pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland: a prospective histopathological and immunohistochemical study. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(1):158-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200401000-00030

Redaelli de Zinis LO, Piccioni M, Antonelli AR, Nicolai P. Management and prognostic factors of recurrent pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland: personal experience and review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265(4):447-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0502-y

Holsinger FC, Bui DT. Anatomy, function, and evaluation of the salivary glands; in Myers EN, Ferris RL (eds): Salivary Gland Disorders. Berlin, Springer. 2007: 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47072-4_1

Joseph ST, Sharankumar S, Sandya CJ, Sivakumar V, Sherry P, Krishnakumar T, et al. Easy and Safe Method for Facial Nerve Identification in Parotid Surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(6):426-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1549001

Hogg SP, Kratz RC. Surgical Exposure of the Facial Nerve. Am Arch Otolaryngol. 1958;67(5):560–1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1958.00730010574011

Kratz RC, Hogg S. Surgical exposure of the facial nerve. J Laryngol Otol. 1958;72(11):902-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100158761

Byars LT. Preservation of the facial nerve in operations for benign conditions of the parotid area. Ann Surg. 1952;136(3):412-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-195209000-00009

Islam, Ashraful. A handy landmark (triangle technique) for identification of the facial nerve during parotid surgery. Otolaryngol Open J. 2022;7:10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23880/ooaj-16000232

Downloads

Published

2025-01-27

How to Cite

Sengupta, S., & Nath, K. (2025). Quick identification and preservation of facial nerve using only posterior belly of digastric muscle . International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 11(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20250119