Hybrid cochlear implant:a scoping review

Authors

  • Santosh Kumar Swain Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20250127

Keywords:

Hybrid cochlear implant, Low-frequency hearing loss, Short electrode

Abstract

 

Cochlear implants (CIs) restore the perception of sound for individuals with severe to profound hearing loss by employing electrical stimulation to directly activate the remaining auditory neurons. Post-implantation ipsilateral hearing loss has been observed in every patient series involving hearing preservation cochlear implantation. Patients with residual hearing in the low-pitched area of the cochlea but severe to profound hearing loss in the middle and high-frequency range can be inserted with a shorter electrode array which preserves the residual hearing. The Hybrid CI, also referred to as electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS), is a type of cochlear implant designed to preserve residual acoustic hearing. It allows for the simultaneous use of a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in the same ear. Expanding electrical speech processing to individuals with more remaining acoustic hearing using a less invasive and shorter cochlear implant marks a significant milestone in cochlear implant technology. In Hybrid CI, the integration of electrical and acoustic hearing often leads to notable improvements in word recognition for the majority of cases. There is a distinct advantage of combining acoustic and electric hearing over relying solely on electrical stimulation, particularly in understanding speech in noisy environments and appreciating music. In general, patients who undergo Hybrid CI express high levels of satisfaction with their outcomes. This review's goal is to discuss Hybrid CI with its history, principles, design, candidacy, advantages, and limitations.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Swain SK. Current criteria for selecting cochlear implant in deaf patients: A review. Int J Adv Med. 2022;9:50-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20214881

Swain SK. Cochlear deformities and its implication in cochlear implantation: a review. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022;10(10):2339-45.

Naples JG, Ruckenstein MJ. Cochlear implant. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020;53(1):87-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2019.09.004

Carlyon RP, Goehring T. Cochlear implant research and development in the twenty-first century: a critical update. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2021;22(5):481-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-021-00811-5

Sahoo L, Swain SK, Das A, Nahak B, Munjal S. Clinical concerns of hearing loss in old age: an Indian perspective. J Geriatr Care Res. 2020;7(2):56-63.

Gantz BJ, Dunn C, Oleson J, Hansen M, Parkinson A, Turner C. Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes. The Laryngoscope. 2016;126(4):962-73.

Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Combining acoustic and electric speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid Implant. Acta Otolaryngologica. 2004;24:344-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480410016423

Gantz BJ, Hansen MR, Turner CW, Oleson JJ, Reiss LA, Parkinson AJ. Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(1):32-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000206493

Turner CW, Reiss LA, Gantz BJ. Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing. Hear Res. 2008; 242:164-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.008

Okada M, Quinkert A, Franck KH, Welling DB. The natural progression of low‐frequency hearing loss in patients who meet hybrid implant system candidacy criteria. The Laryng. 2020;130(5):1299-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28217

Swain SK. Cochlear implant and tinnitus: A review. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;7(12):1960-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20214698

Kopelovich JC, Reiss LA, Etler CP, Xu L, Bertroche JT, Gantz BJ, et al. Hearing loss after activation of hearing preservation cochlear implants might be related to afferent cochlear innervation injury. Otology & neurotology. 2015;36(6):1035-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000754

Pujol R, Puel JL. Excitotoxicity, synaptic repair, and functional recovery in the mammalian cochlea: a review of recent findings. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;884:249-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08646.x

Dunn CC, Oleson J, Parkinson A, Hansen MR, Gantz BJ. Nucleus hybrid S12: multicenter clinical trial results. The Laryngoscope. 2020;130(10):548-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28628

Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A, Henry BA. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;115:1729-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1687425

Salmon MK, Quimby AE, Bartellas M, Kaufman HS, Bigelow DC, Brant JA, et al. Long-term hearing outcomes after hybrid cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology. 2023;44(7):679-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003924

Tejani VD, Brown CJ. Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing. The J Acoustical Society of America. 2020;147(5):3667-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001304

Swain SK. Age related hearing loss and cognitive impairment–A current perspective. Int J Res Med Sci. 2021;9(1):317-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20205863

Luetje CM, Thedinger BS, Buckler LR, Dawson KL, Lisbona KL. Hybrid cochlear implantation: clinical results and critical review in 13 cases. Otology & Neurotology. 2007;28(4):473-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0b013e3180423aed

Henderson D, Bielefeld EC, Harris KC, Hu BH. The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear and hearing. 2006;27(1):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000191942.36672.f3

Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after ‘‘temporary’’ noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci. 2009;29:14077-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009

22.Konrad S, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Paasche G. Impedance development after implantation of hybrid-L24 cochlear implant electrodes. Int J Audiol. 2023;62(12):1137-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2022.2125914

Reiss LA, Turner CW, Erenberg SR, Gantz BJ. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007;8:241-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-007-0077-8

Dorman MF, Gifford R, Lewis K, McKarns S, Ratigan J, Spahr A, et al. Word recognition following implantation of conventional and 10-mm hybrid electrodes. Audiol Neurotol. 2009;14(3):181-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000171480

Waldeck S, Schmidt S, von Falck C, Chapot R, Brockmann M, Overhoff D. New hybrid multiplanar cone beam computed tomography-laser-fluoroscopic-guided approach in cochlear implant surgery. Int J Computer-assisted Radiol Surg. 2022;17(10):1837-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02703-2

Kiefer J, Pok M, Adunka O, Stürzebecher E, Baumgartner W, Schmidt M, et al. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurot. 2005;10(3):134-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000084023

Swain SK. Cochlear deformities and its implication in cochlear implantation: a review. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022;10(10):2339-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20222547

Gantz BJ, Dunn C, Oleson J, Hansen M, Parkinson A, Turner C. Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes. The Laryngoscope. 2016;126(4):962-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25572

Van Abel KM, Dunn CC, Sladen DP, Oleson JJ, Beatty CW, Neff BA, et al. Hearing preservation among patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Otology & neurotology. 2015;36(3):416-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000703

Gifford RH, Grantham DW, Sheffield SW, Davis TJ, Dwyer R, Dorman MF. Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. Hear Res. 2014;312:28-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.02.007

Gfeller KE, Olszewski C, Turner C, Gantz B, Oleson J. Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neuroootol. 2006;11(1):12-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000095608

Tambyraja RR, Gutman MA, Megerian CA. Cochlear Implant Complications: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:245-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.3.245

Swain SK. Vertigo following cochlear implantation: A review. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022;10(2):572-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20220310

Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R, Elston J, Weiner G, Taylor RS, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Ass. 2009;13(44):1-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta13440

Downloads

Published

2025-01-27

How to Cite

Swain, S. K. (2025). Hybrid cochlear implant:a scoping review. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 11(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20250127

Issue

Section

Review Articles