Incidence of sinonasal anatomical variations associated with chronic sinusitis by CT scan in Karaikal, South India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20172291Keywords:
Paranasal sinuses, Anatomical variations, Chronic sinusitis, Diagnostic nasal endoscopy, CT paranasalAbstract
Background: Variations in sinonasal anatomy of adults are common and vary among different populations. Their role in development of pathological conditions such as sinusitis, epistaxis, etc is debated. Having clear picture of sinonasal anatomy of a person is essential in avoidance of complications during surgery. This study was done to analyze sinonasal anatomy in adults from Karaikal region having chronic sinusitis by nasal endoscopy and CT scan imaging.
Methods: A total of 50 patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery were studied by preoperative nasal endoscopy, CT scanning and endoscopy at the time of definitive surgery and variations recorded and analyzed.
Results: The incidence of the sinonasal anatomical variations in CT scan study were – discharge in the frontal sinus (100%), agger nasi cells (96%), deviated nasal septum (70%), anterior ethmoidal cells (86%), posterior ethmoidal cells (58%), sinus lateralis (52%), frontal cells (50%), discharge in sphenoid sinus (50%), pneumatised superior turbinate (46%), INSA (34%), prominent bulla ethmoidalis (30%), supra orbital cells (26%), pneumatised septum(16%), medialised uncinate process (16%), paradoxical middle turbinate (16%), Haller cells (14%), supreme turbinate (14%), pneumatised inferior turbinate (12%), frontal recess obliteration (12%), absent pneumatisation of frontal sinus (12%), pneumatised middle turbinate (10%), Onodi cells (6%), pneumatised uncinate process (2%), maxillary sinus septation (2%).
Conclusions: The high incidence of variations emphasises the need for proper preoperative assessment for safe and effective endoscopic sinus surgery.
Metrics
References
Gebrim ES. Relevance of sinonasal anatomical variations in the preoperative evaluation by computed tomography for endonasal surger. Radiol Bras. 2008;41:5-6
Badia L, Lund VJ, Wei W, Ho WK. Ethnic variation in sinonasal anatomy on CT-scanning. Rhinology. 2005;43:210-4.
Jones NS. CT of the paranasal sinuses: a review of the correlation with clinical, surgical and histopathological findings. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002;27:11-7.
Kaygusuz A, Haksever M, Akduman D, Aslan S, Sayar Z. Sinonasal Anatomical Variations: Their Relationship with Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Effect on the Severity of Disease—A Computerized Tomography Assisted Anatomical and Clinical Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;6:260–6.
Aramani A, Karadi RN, Kumar S. A Study of Anatomical Variations of Osteomeatal Complex in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients-CT Findings. J Clin Diag Res. 2014;8:1-4.
Shpilberg KA, Daniel SC, Doshi AH, Lawson W, Som PM. CT of Anatomic Variants of the Paranasal Sinuses and Nasal Cavity - poor Correlation With Radiologically Significant Rhinosinusitis but Importance in Surgical Planning. Neuroradiology/Head and Neck Imaging AJR. 2015;204:1255-60.
Thimmappa TD, Amith P, Nagaraj M, Harsha KN, Gangadhar KS, Azeem A. Anatomical variations of sinonasal region: a CT scan study. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014;2:1441-5.
Kumar P, Rakesh BS, Prasad R. Anatomical variations of sinonasal region, a coronal ct scan study. Int J Contemporary Med Res. 2016;3(9):2601-4.
Lebowitz RA, Terk A, Jacobs JB, Holliday RA. Asymmetry of the ethmoid roof: analysis using coronal computed tomography. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:2122–4.
Adeel M, Rajput MS, Akhter S, Ikram M, Arain A, Khattak YJ. Anatomical variations of nose and para-nasal sinuses; CT scan review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(3):317-9.
Stankiewicz JA, Chow JM. The low skull base-is it important? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;13:19–21.
Hudgins P. Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery: the role of the radiologist in prevention. Radiologic Clin North Am. 1993;31:21–32.
Becker Samuel S, Becker Daniel G. Diagnosis and Management of Disorders of the Nose and Sinuses. Available from: URL: http: // www. sinustreatmentcenter.com /BOOK/ chapter11_0109.pdf. Accessed on 15 July 2011.
Dua K, Chopra H, Khurana AS, Munjal M. CT scan variations in chronic sinusitis. Ind J Radiol Imag. 2005;15:315-20.
Hwang PH, Irwin SB, Griest SE, Caro JE, Nesbit GM. Radiologic correlates of symptom-based diagnostic criteria for chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol HeadNeck Surg. 2003;128:489–96.
Ferguson BJ, Narita M, Yu VL, Wagener MM, Gwaltney JM Jr. Prospective observational study of chronic rhinosinusitis: environmentaltriggers and antibiotic implications. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:62–8.
Kantarci M, Karasen RM, Alper F, Onbas O, Okur A, Karaman A. Remarkable anatomic variations in paranasal sinus region and their clinical importance. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50:296–302.
Nouraei SA, Elisay AR, Dimarco A, Abdi R, Majidi H, Madani SA, et al. Variations in paranasal sinus anatomy: implications for the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis and safety of endoscopic sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38:32–7.
Tomovic S, Esmaeili A, Chan NJ, Shukla PA, Choudhry OJ, Liu JK, et al. High-resolution computed tomography analysis of the prevalence of Onodi cells. Laryngoscope 2012;122:1470–3.
Hamid O, El Fiky L, Hassan O, Kotb A, El Fiky S. Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus and their impact on trans-sphenoid pituitary surgery. Skull Base. 2008;18:9–15.
Comer BT, Kincaid NW, Smith NJ, Wallace JH, Kountakis SE. Frontal sinus septations predict the presence of supraorbital ethmoid cells. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:2090–3.
Han MH, Chang KH, Min YG, Choi WS, Yeon KM, Han MC. Nontraumatic prolapse of the orbital contents into the ethmoid sinus: evaluation with screening sinus CT. Am J Otolaryngol. 1996;17:184–9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
