Cochlear implant: factors that impact hearing outcomes

Authors

  • Maria J. Casanova Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
  • Afonso Castro Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
  • João V. Lino Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
  • Cátia Bernardes Hospital de Santa Maria, Porto, Portugal
  • António Magalhães Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
  • Luís Meireles Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20232517

Keywords:

Sensorineural hearing loss, Cochlear implant, Complications, Hearing outcomes

Abstract

Background: Cochlear implant has been providing hearing rehabilitation to patients with severe hearing loss. However, not all patients achieve optimal results, and the goal of this study was to evaluate the factors that influence hearing outcomes in cochlear implantation.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the patients who underwent cochlear implantation in our institution between 2018 and 2021. Review of clinical files and complementary tests, and analysis of hearing outcomes and complications were performed.   

Results: Sixty-nine cochlear implants were placed in 64 patients, with an average age of 49.3 years. In initial evaluation post activation and 1 year after implantation, the average pure tone average (PTA) was 37 dB, with a vocal discrimination of 48.7% at 50 dB, and 28, 6 dB, with a discrimination of 73.8% at 50 dB, respectively. Patients with postlingual deafness had better hearing outcomes at 1 year post surgery, in both PTA (27.9 compared to 33 dB) and discrimination at 50 dB (76.5 compared to 56.1%). Only one case had a major complication.

Conclusions: In conclusion, we found that increased implant use by the patient, postlingual deafness, and in-creased surgeon experience, were factors that improved hearing outcomes in patients undergoing cochlear implantation.

References

Farinetti A, Ben Gharbia D, Mancini J, Roman S, Nicollas R, Triglia JM. Cochlear implant complications in 403 patients: comparative study of adults and children and review of the literature. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014;131(3):177-82.

Naples JG, Ruckenstein MJ. Cochlear Implant. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020;53(1):87-102.

Sousa AF, Couto MIV, Martinho-Carvalho AC. Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84(4):494-9.

Chen F, Ni W, Li W, Li H. Cochlear Implantation and Rehabilitation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1130:129-44.

Aldhafeeri AM, Alsanosi AA. Management of surgical difficulties during cochlear implant with inner ear anomalies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;92:45-9.

Venail F, Sicard M, Piron JP, Levi A, Artieres F, Uziel A, et al. Reliability and complications of 500 consecutive cochlear implantations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(12):1276-81.

Gaylor JM, Raman G, Chung M, Lee J, Rao M, Lau J, et al. Cochlear implantation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(3):265-72.

Adunka O, Kiefer J, Unkelbach MH, Radeloff A, Gstoettner W. Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;30(2):121-7.

Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, Bergeron F, Beynon A, Burke E, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):36-47.

Peng KA, Kuan EC, Hagan S, Wilkinson EP, Miller ME. Cochlear Nerve Aplasia and Hypoplasia: Predictors of Cochlear Implant Success. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;157(3):392-400.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles