Entina HearSmart: a novel mobile based auditory training app for better adaptation of hearing aids


  • Rohan S. Navelkar Consultant ENT Surgeon, Lotus ENT Hospital, Mumbai, India; Consultant ENT Surgeon, Entina ENT Clinic, Mumbai, India
  • Radhika Shukla Consultant ENT Surgeon, Lotus ENT Hospital, Mumbai, India; Consultant ENT Surgeon, Entina ENT Clinic, Mumbai, India




Hearing aids, Hearing, Audiometry, Auditory training


Background: The most common intervention prescribed for hearing impaired individuals is hearing aids. It has been noticed that in spite of using hearing aids, elderly individuals with hearing impairment, still struggle in hearing and understanding. Therefore, additional intervention is required for auditory rehabilitation to ease the adaptation of hearing aids. Evidence from studies published in the recent years suggests that, auditory training is likely a useful tool to improve speech perception and other cognitive skills in patients with hearing loss with and without the use of hearing aids. The aim of the study was to test the usefulness of our mobile app-based auditory training program to increase speech reception and communication and thereby improve hearing aid adaptability in patients with sensorineural hearing loss who have been fitted with a hearing aid.

Methods: 40 patients were selected for the study, they were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 consisted of 20 patients who received auditory training using Entina HearSmart Android App, Group 2 consisted of 20 patients who received no auditory training (Control group).

Results: The results showed that performance on the vowel, consonant and sentence tests in noise was significantly increased in patients who used our app for auditory training compared with that of the Non-Training Group.

Conclusions: Entina HearSmart is a free, standardized and easy way to improve the outcome of hearing aids in adults and must be prescribed when a hearing aid has been fitted. When used sincerely after hearing aids have been fitted, using our app can significantly improve communication and thereby improve hearing aid adaptability.

Author Biographies

Rohan S. Navelkar, Consultant ENT Surgeon, Lotus ENT Hospital, Mumbai, India; Consultant ENT Surgeon, Entina ENT Clinic, Mumbai, India

Consultant ENT Surgeon, Lotus ENT Hospital;

Consultant ENT Surgeon, Entina ENT Clinic

Radhika Shukla, Consultant ENT Surgeon, Lotus ENT Hospital, Mumbai, India; Consultant ENT Surgeon, Entina ENT Clinic, Mumbai, India

Consultant ENT Surgeon, Entina ENT Clinic;

Consultant ENT Surgeon, Lotus ENT Hospital


Humes LE, Roberts L. Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: the contributions of audibility. J Speech Hear Res. 1990;33(4):726-35.

McCoy SL, Tun PA, Cox LC, Colangelo M, Stewart RA, Wingfield A. Hearing loss and perceptual effort: downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005;58(1):22-33.

Hällgren M, Larsby B, Lyxell B, Arlinger S. Speech understanding in quiet and noise, with and without hearing aids. Int J Audiol. 2005;44(10):574-83.

Hagerman B. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. Scand Audiol. 1984;13(1):57-63.

Shinn-Cunningham BG, Best V. Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing. Trends Amplif. 2008;12(4):283-99.

Rönnberg J, Lunner T, Zekveld A, et al. The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013;7(6).

Stephens D, Hétu R. Impairment, disability and handicap in audiology: towards a consensus. Audiology. 1991;30(4):185-200.

Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Festen JM, Kuik DJ. Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilatation. Audiology. 1997;36(3):155-64.

Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Houtgast T. Occupational performance: comparing normally-hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work. Int J Audiol. 2006;45(9):503-12.

Gatehouse S, Gordon J. Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification. Br J Audiol. 1990;24(1):63-8.

Edwards B. The Future of Hearing Aid Technology. Trends Amplif. 2007;11(1):31-45.

Hornsby BWY. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands. Ear Hear. 2013;34(5):523-34.

Chisolm TH, Saunders GH, Frederick MT, McArdle RA, Smith SL, Wilsond RH. Learning to listen again: the role of compliance in auditory training for adults with hearing loss. Am J Audiol. 2013;22(2):339-42.

Henshaw H, McCormack A, Ferguson MA. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation is associated with computer-based auditory training uptake, engagement, and adherence for people with hearing loss. Front Psychol. 2015;6.

Davies HR, Cadar D, Herbert A, Orrell M, Steptoe A. Hearing Impairment and Incident Dementia: Findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(9):2074-81.

Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, Hildesheimer M, Henkin Y. Hearing aid satisfaction and use in the advanced digital era. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(9):2029-36.

Lin FR, Metter EJ, O’Brien RJ, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(2):214-20.

Lin FR, Ferrucci L, Metter EJ, An Y, Zonderman AB, Resnick SM. Hearing loss and cognition in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Neuropsychology. 2011;25(6):763-70.

Fulton SE, Lister JJ, Bush ALH, Edwards JD, Andel R. Mechanisms of the Hearing-Cognition Relationship. Semin Hear. 2015;36(3):140-9.

Henshaw H, Ferguson MA. Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence. PLoS One. 2013;8(5).

Olson AD. Options for Auditory Training for Adults with Hearing Loss. Semin Hear. 2015;36(4):284-95.

Dubno JR. Benefits of Auditory Training for Aided Listening by Older Adults. Am J Audiol. 2013;22(2):335.

Tye-Murray N, Sommers MS, Mauze E, Schroy C, Barcroft J, Spehar B. Using patient perceptions of relative benefit and enjoyment to assess auditory training. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23(8):623-34.

Wright BA, Zhang Y. A review of the generalization of auditory learning. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1515):301.

Lawrence BJ, Jayakody DMP, Henshaw H. Auditory and Cognitive Training for Cognition in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trends Hear. 2018;22.

Anderson S, Jenkins K. Electrophysiologic Assessment of Auditory Training Benefits in Older Adults. Semin Hear. 2015;36(4):250.

Yu J, Jeon H, Song C, Han W. Speech perception enhancement in elderly hearing aid users using an auditory training program for mobile devices. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(1):61-8.

Sweetow RW, Sabes JH. Auditory training and challenges associated with participation and compliance. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21(9):586-93.

Nkyekyer J, Meyer D, Pipingas A, Reed NS. The cognitive and psychosocial effects of auditory training and hearing aids in adults with hearing loss. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:123-35.

Völter C, Schirmer C, Stöckmann C, Dazert S. Computer-based auditory training for hearing rehabilitation of adult cochlear implant users. HNO. 2020;68(11):817-27.

Gil D, Iorio MCM. Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid users. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(2):165-74.

Humes LE, Skinner KG, Kinney DL, Rogers SE, Main AK, Quigley TM. Clinical Effectiveness of an At-Home Auditory Training Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ear Hear. 2019;40(5):1043-60.






Original Research Articles