Prospective study on sterilization of rigid endoscopes in various otolaryngology clinics

Authors

  • Varun Lakshmanan Department of Otorhinolaryngology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Goutham M. K. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Vimal Karnaker Department of Microbiology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Rajeshwari Aroor Department of Otorhinolaryngology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Shrinath Kamath P. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Vadish Bhat Department of Otorhinolaryngology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Irene Gee Varghese Department of Otorhinolaryngology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20171196

Keywords:

Endoscope sterilization, Rigid endoscopes, High level disinfection, Sterilization technique

Abstract

Background: Rigid endoscopes have revolutionized the diagnosis and management of upper aerodigestive pathologies. Inadequate disinfection and sterilization techniques carry increased risk for cross infection. Hence, they require high level disinfection to effectively reduce the bacterial and fungal contamination of rigid endoscopes. The present study analyses the various techniques of sterilization practised in Mangaluru, Karnataka, at different Otorhinolaryngology clinics.

Methods: This prospective descriptive study was done on 30 rigid endoscopes. Swabs were taken from the endoscopes and container, and send for detailed microbiological examination. The different methods practised at various centres were documented.  

Results: The various sterilization technique practised was predominantly cetrimide and chlorhexidine solution (savlon) wash, ETO and Formaldehyde. However, among all techniques the microbiological studies revealed no growth.

Conclusions: Rigid endoscopes have emerged as the best diagnostic equipment for otorhinolaryngologists. With regard to high level disinfection and sterilization, the endoscope must undergo recommended techniques. In our study the most commonly used techniques was cetrimide and chlorhexidine solution wash and less commonly ETO and Formaldehyde. The use of standard sterilization technique and maintaining the rigid endoscopes in sterile storage container is the key to maintain an organism free environment. The standard technique of prewash with water and soap water, then washing with cetrimide and chlorhexidine solution, then store the endoscope in sterile container is our recommendation. 

References

William AR, David JW. Disinfection and Sterilization in Health Care Facilities: What Clinicians Need to Know? Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2004; 9(39):702-9

Sehulster L, Chinn R. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;52:1–44

Peterson, Cohen, Kowalski, Park. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. 2011; 6(73):1075-84

Bhattacharyya N, Kepnes LJ. The effectiveness of immersion disinfection for flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;6(130):681-5

William AR, David JW, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008.

The care and Handling of Rigid and Flexible Scopes. A continuing Education activity by Pfiedler enterprises 2015

Giesla CC, Teresa R, Brandao S and Cristina LM. Ethylene oxide sterilization of medical devices: A Review. American journal of Infection control. 2007;11: 574-81

Spaulding EH, Ellen KE, Mildred LG. Ethylene oxide sterilization. American journal of nursing. 1958;11(58):1530-1

Gerald M, Denvier. Antiseptics and disinfectants: Activity. Action and resistance. Clinical microbiology reviews. 1999;1(12):147-79

Gorman SP, Eileen MS, Russel AD. A Review antimicrobial activity, uses and mechanism of Action of Glutaraldehyde. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 1980;48:161 – 90.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles