Evaluation of outcome of ossiculoplasty with and without an intact malleus

Authors

  • Vivek Kumar Kesarwani Department of ENT, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Harendra Kumar R. Gautam Department of ENT, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Surendra Kumar R. Kanaujia Department of ENT, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Nishant S. Saxena Department of ENT, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Amrita Srivastava Department of ENT, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20221055

Keywords:

Ossiculoplasty, OOPS index, Malleus bone

Abstract

Background: CSOM is commonly encountered in the clinical practice as a cause of conductive hearing loss. Preoperative evaluation of hearing becomes mandatory for proper management. Ossiculoplasty is usually done in conductive hearing loss due to ossicular chain abnormality in CSOM. The aim of the evaluation of outcome of ossiculoplasty with and without an intact malleus.

Methods: Total 40 patients greater than 18 years with mucosal type of CSOM with good cochlear reserve and Eustachian tube function, requiring intact canal wall mastoidectomy onlywere taken. All cases were planned ossiculoplasty with tympanoplasty or tympanomastoidectomy and postoperative follow-up done with measurement of Pure-tone average air-bone gap Ossiculoplasty Outcome Parameter Staging (OOPS) index and complications. Simple random sampling technique is used to calculate the size during the study.

Results: Ossiculoplasty was done in all cases in which 50% of patients (n=20) had malleus and 50% (n=20) with no malleus and AB gap in both group have almost similar result.

Conclusions: Ossiculoplasty techniques using neo malleus struts combined with assembly prostheses, in middle ear reconstruction was studied and was non-significant.

References

Bahmad FMS. Histopathology of ossicular grafts and implants in chronic otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007;116(3):181-91.

Kartush J. Ossicular chain reconstruction: capitulum to malleus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1994;27(4):689-715.

Belluci R. Selection of cases and classification of tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1989;22:911-29.

Becvarovski Z. Smoking and tympanoplasty: implications for prognosis and the middle ear risk index (MERI). Laryngoscope. 2001;110(10):1806-11.

Black B. Neomalleus ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23(5):636-42.

Black B. Ossiculoplasty prognosis: the spite method of assessment. Am J Otol. 1992;13(6):544-51.

Bayazit YA, Ozer E, Kanlikama M, Durmaz T, Yilma M. Bone cement ossiculoplasty: incus to stapes versus malleus to stapes cement bridge. Otol Neurotol. May 2005;26(3):364-7.

Quérat C, Martin C, Prades JM, Richard C. Canal wall up tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma with intact stapes. Comparison of hearing results between cartilage and PORP on stapes and impact of malleus removal and total reinforcement of the tympanic membrane by cartilage. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014;131(4):211-6.

Page JC, Cox MD, King D, Allsopp T, Dornhoffer JL. Long-term Outcomes of Ossiculoplasty with and Without an Intact Malleus. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(1):73-8.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-22

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles