Challenges in treating patients with foreign bodies in hypopharynx and esophagus: our experience in a tertiary care hospital

Nambiar Sapna S.; Swathilal S. A.; Sunilkumar K. P.; Soumya Aravind M. V.

doi:10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20213902

Authors

Nambiar Sapna S. Department of ENT, Government Medical College Kozhikode, Kerala, India http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-6354
Swathilal S. A. Department of ENT, Government Medical College Kozhikode, Kerala, India
Sunilkumar K. P. Department of ENT, Government Medical College Kozhikode, Kerala, India
Soumya Aravind M. V. Department of ENT, Government Medical College Kozhikode, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20213902

Keywords:

Foreign body (FB), Hypopharynx and esophagus, Rigid endoscopy

Abstract

Background: Foreign bodies (FBs) of the hypopharynx and esophagus are among the common otolaryngologic emergencies. Every new case poses a clinical challenge with need for optimal treatment strategy. The objective of our study is to highlight a few of the challenges faced while treating these patients.

Methods: A prospective study was done on all patients who reported to the ENT casualty, Government Medical College Kozhikode with history or suspicion of foreign body throat from January 2020 to January 2021. A total of 160 patients reported of which 48 (30%) patients required further evaluation with rigid endoscopy and foreign body removal in the operative room. A few challenges like migration of foreign bodies, dilemma in diagnosis with FB mimicking ossified cartilages on X-ray, FB removal in mentally challenged patients and treatment of esophageal perforation post rigid endoscopy are discussed.

Results: Only 48 (30%) patients of the total 160 patients required rigid endoscopy and foreign body removal in the operating room. The foreign body was obtained in 42 (87.5%) patients while 6 (12.5%) patients improved post rigid endoscopy though foreign body was not obtained. One patient with denture in the esophagus developed esophageal perforation requiring prolonged hospital stay.

Conclusions: A high index of suspicion among patients presenting with dysphagia, neck pain and sudden decrease in food intake is warranted. Early diagnosis with appropriate imaging modalities is essential for confirmation of diagnosis. Dentures are among FBs that necessitate more caution. Esophageal perforation, a rare but life-threatening complication must be diagnosed timely with appropriate surgical intervention.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Singh BH, Kantu M, Har-El G, Lucente FE. Complications associated with 327 foreign bodies of the pharynx, larynx and esophagus. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997;106:3014.

Nandi P, Ong GB. Foreign body in the esophagus: review of 2394 cases. Br J Surg. 1978;65:5-9.

Kumar AGN. Foreign bodies in esophagus: our experiences. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;5:83-7.

Webb WA. Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract: update. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:39-50.

Ambe P, Weber SA, Schauer M, Knoefel WT. Swallowed foreign bodies in adults. Dtsch A ¨rztebl Int. 2012;109:869-75.

Peng A, Li Y, Xiao Z. Study of clinical treatment of esophageal foreign body induced esophageal perforation with lethal complications. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:2027-36.

Bonadio WA, Jona JZ, Glicklich M, Cohen R. Esophageal bougienage technique for coin ingestion in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;23:917-8.

Iwata S, Mishima Y, Nishimura T. 615 cases with foreign bodies in the oesophagus and bronchotracheal tree during the last 10 years-as statistical analyses gathered from the departments of ENT of seven universities in the Tokai area in Japan. J Jpn Bronchoesophagol. 1996;47:510-25.

Pak MW, Lee WC, Fung HK, Hasselt CA. A prospective study of foreign-body ingestion in 311 children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;58:37-45.

Nwaorgu OG, Onakoya PA, Sogebi OA. Esophageal impacted dentures. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96(10):1350-53.

Agrawal D, Lahiri TK, Parmar A, Sharma S. Swallowed partial dentures. Indian J dent Sc. 2012;4(2):7-12.

A.A. Adeyemo and S.A. Ogunkeyede. Denture impaction in the oesophagus: correlation of site and duration of impaction with sequelae. Ann Ibadan Postgraduate Med. 2019;17(1):65-70.

Wu IS, Ho TL, Chang CC, Lee HS, Chen MK. Value of lateral neck radiography for ingested foreign bodies using the likelihood ratio. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;37(2):292-6.

Anderson KL, Dean AJ. Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract and anorectal emergencies. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2011;29(2):369-400,

Senar AC, Dinu LE, Artigas JM, Larrosa R, Navarro Y, Angulo E. Foreign Bodies on Lateral Neck Radiographs in Adults: Imaging Findings and Common Pitfalls. Radio Graphics. 2017;37:323-45.

Hariga I, Khamassi K, Zribi S, Amor MB, Gamra OB, Mbarek C et al. Management of foreign bodies in the aerodigestive tract.I ndian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66(1):220-4.

Pinto A, Muzj C, Gagliardi N, Pinto F, Setola FR, Scaglione M et al. Role of imaging in the assessment of impacted foreign bodies in the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus. Semin Ultrasound CTMR. 2012;33:463-70.

Hsu WC, Sheen TS, Lin CD. Clinical experiences of removing foreign bodies in the airway and esophagus with a rigid endoscope: A series of 3217 cases from 1970 to 1996. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122(3):450-4.

Pang KP, Tan NG, Chia KH, et al. Migrating foreign body into the common carotid artery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132(4):667-8.

DePietro J, Devaiah A. Endoscopic removal of esophageal foreign body and drainage of thyroid abscess. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34(2):151-3.

Sepesi B, Raymond DP, Peters JH. Esophageal perforation: surgical, endoscopic and medical management strategies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26:379-83.

Søreide JA, Viste A. Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:66.