DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20212452
Published: 2021-06-23

A comparative study of temporalis fascia versus tragal perichondrium graft in myringoplasty

Arun A. Jose, Nirmal C. Venkataramanujam, Padmanabhan Karthikeyan, Ramiya R. Kaipuzha, Davis Thomas Pulimoottil

Abstract


Background: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of temporalis fascia and tragal perichondrium grafts in myringoplasty and to assess the hearing improvement following surgery.

Methods: This was a clinical prospective study involving 50 patients of chronic suppurative otitis media inactive mucosal disease who were assigned to two groups. Group I was temporalis fascia group and group II was tragal perichondrium group and subsequently underwent myringoplasty. Patients were followed up at 3 and 6 months.

Results: There was a preponderance of ear disease among children, with a male to female ratio of 1:1.63. Preoperative dry ear for 1-6 months was associated with 82.9% success rate (group I 76.5%, group II 87.5%). Patients with cellular mastoids were associated with 100% success rate.

Conclusions: In this study we found that patients with cellular mastoids and dry ear for 1-6 months were associated with higher success rates. The study also revealed that in terms of hearing gain postoperatively, the temporalis fascia graft fared slightly better than the tragal perichondrium graft. Tragal perichondrium and temporalis fascia grafts appear to have almost similar graft take rates.


Keywords


Myringoplasty, Temporalis fascia, Tragal perichondrium, Graft take rate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dabholkar JP, Vora K, Sikdar A. Comparative study of underlay tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia and tragal perichondrium. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;59(2):116-9.

Manolidis S. Closure of tympanic membrane perforation. In: Glasscock ME, Gulya AJ, eds. Glasscock-Shambaugh Surgery of the Ear. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Pub; 2003: 400-6.

Mathai J. Myringoplasty with temporalis fascia: analysis of 200 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;51(2):9-13.

Singh BJ, Sengupta A, Das SK, Ghosh D, Basak B. A comparative study of different graft materials used in myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;61(2):131-4.

Glasscock ME. Tympanic membrane grafting with fascia: overlay vs. undersurface technique. Laryngoscope. 1973:754-70.

Glasscock ME, Jackson CG, Nissen AJ, Schwaber MK. Postauricular undersurface tympanic membrane grafting: a follow-up report. Laryngoscope. 1982;92:718-27.

Albera R, Ferrero V, Lacilla M, Canale A. Tympanic reperforation in myringoplasty: evaluation of prognostic factors. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115(12):875-9.

Brown C, Yi Q, McCarty DJ, Briggs RJS. The success rate following myringoplasty at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital. Aust J Otolaryngol. 2002;5(1):21-5.

Sharma DK, Singh S, Sohal BS, Singh B. Prospective study of myringoplasty using different approaches. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;61(4):297-300.

Thomas CP, Nielsen RT, Tos M. Bilateral myringoplasty in chronic otitis media. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:903-6.

Gupta SC. Myringoplasty with a single flap. Ear Nose Throat J. 2000;79(12):946-8.