Forehead flap: a reconstructive option in selected complex defects following resection of oral cancers staged T4

Authors

  • Deepika Kenkere Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
  • S. M. Azeem Mohiyuddin Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0974-2057
  • Ravindra P. Deo Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
  • Sagayaraj A. Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
  • Kouser Mohammadi Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
  • Prashanth Babu Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
  • Shuaib Merchant Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
  • Sumanth K. R. Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
  • Gopinath K. S. Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20210970

Keywords:

Folded forehead flap, Salvage reconstruction, Full thickness resection of cheek, Complications, Oral commissure

Abstract

Background: Head and neck squamous carcinoma constitutes 30% of malignancies in our region, oral carcinoma being most common among them. Most of these tumours involve lower gingivobuccal sulcus and buccal mucosa. 80% patients present with locally advanced disease. Following resection of these tumours, reconstruction of composite defects is challenging. Though microvascular free flaps are ideal in such cases, it is not always feasible due to malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, sometimes non–availability of microvascular surgeon and financial constraints. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, the workhorse of reconstruction is bulky, non-pliable and cannot be advanced over intact mandible. Forehead flap in complex defects is pliable, versatile, has excellent vascularity and colour matching, easy to harvest and suitable in selected cases and as salvage flap when other flaps fail. The aim of the study was to document outcome of folded forehead flap reconstruction of complex defects following resection of T4 staged oral carcinoma.

Methods: This retrospective study in a tertiary rural hospital included 31 patients with oral carcinoma staged T4. The patients underwent folded forehead flap reconstruction for full thickness cheek defects with some extending into oral commissure and lower lip, along with segmental or alveolar resection of mandible or maxilla.

Results: 27 patients had uneventful healing, 2 had wound dehiscence and 2 had necrosis of distal part of flap. Patients with externally rotated flap had mild trismus and patients in whom forehead flap was used to reconstruct the oral commissure had oral incompetence.

Conclusions: Folded forehead flap is good reconstructive option in complex full thickness defects of cheek and as salvage reconstruction.

Author Biographies

Deepika Kenkere, Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Professor and HOD, Department of Dentistry

Fellow Oral Oncosurgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery

S. M. Azeem Mohiyuddin, Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Professor

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery

Ravindra P. Deo, Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Professor

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery

Sagayaraj A., Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Associate Professor

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery

Kouser Mohammadi, Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Assistant Professor

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery

Prashanth Babu, Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Assistant Professor

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery

Shuaib Merchant, Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Assistant Professor

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surger

Sumanth K. R., Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Fellow,Head and Neck Surgical Oncology

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery

Gopinath K. S., Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Professor

Department of Surgical Oncology

References

GLOBOCAN, 2012; Available at: www. globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed on 12 November, 2016.

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7.

Gatta G, Botta L, Sanchez M J, Anderson L A, Pierannunzio D, Licitra L. EUROCARE Working Group: Prognoses and improvement for head and neck cancers diagnosed in Europe in early 2000s: The EUROCARE-5 population-based study. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:2130.

Dandekar M, Tuljapurkar V, Dhar H, Panwar A, DCruz A K. Head and neck cancers in India. J Surg Oncol. 2017;9999:1-9

Lingen M W, Kalmar J R, Karrison T, Speight P M. Critical evaluation of diagnostic aids for the detection of oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2008;44:10-22.

Mallath M K, Taylor D G, Badwe R A. The growing burden of cancer in India: Epidemiology and social context. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e205-e212.

Shah J P, Gil Z. Current concepts in management of oral cancer – surgery. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(0):394-401.

Heller L, Cole P, Kaufman Y. Cheek Reconstruction: Current Concepts. 2020.

in Managing Facial Soft Tissue Loss. Seminars. In: Plastic Surgery. 2008;22(4):294-305.

David ES.Limitations of the Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap in Head and Neck Cancer Reconstruction. Arch Otolaryng. 1980;106(11):709-14.

Tripathi M, Parshad S, Karwasra R K, Singh V. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction: An experience in 100 consecutive cases. National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015;6(1):37-41.

Kalyani R, Das S, Bindra Singh MS, Kumar H. Cancer profile in Kolar: A ten years study. Indian J Cancer. 2010;47:160-5.

Mc Gregor I A. The temporal flap in intra-oral cancer: Its use in repairing the post-excisional defect. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;16:318-35.

Conley J J. Regional Flaps of the Head and Neck. Philadelphia, WB Saunders. 1976;65.

Shah JP. Folded forehead flap for reconstruction of full – thickness defects of the cheek. Head and Neck Surgery. 1980;2(3):248-252.

Shaikh MI, Rajput F, Khatoon S, Shaikh MA. Forehead Flap for Reconstruction of Maxillofacial Region Defects. Journal of Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences. 2014;13(2):61-66.

Agbara R, Fomete B, Obiadazie AC, Omege KU, Amole OI. The Forehead Flap: a valuable option in resource depleted environment. Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 2016;3:115-120.

McGregor IA, Reid WH. The use of the temporal flap in the primary repair of full thickness defects of the cheek. Plast Reconst Surg. 1966;38:1-9.

Kavarana NM. Use of a folded forehead flap for reconstruction after a large excision of full thickness of the cheek. Plast Reconst Surg. 1975;56(6):629-632.

Wei E C, Tan B K, Chen I H, Hau S E, Liau C T. Mimicking lip features in free-flap reconstruction of lip defects. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2001;54:8-11.

Frunza A, Beedsay A, Anghel A, Lascar I. The Forehead Flap. Interesting Case Series. Bucharest Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest University School of Medicine, Romania. 2014.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles