A comparative study of results of stapedotomy and neo-stapedotomy as a surgical treatment for otosclerosis


  • Sabyasachi Gon Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences, RKMSP, Kolkata, West Bengal
  • Debabrata Biswas Department of ENT, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal
  • Rabi Hembrom Department of ENT, Midnapore Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal
  • Ushirin Bose Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences, RKMSP, Kolkata, West Bengal
  • Saurabh Gupta Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences, RKMSP, Kolkata, West Bengal




Neo-stapedotomy, Stapedotomy, Stapedial reflex, Speech discrimination score, Loudness discomfort level


Background: The aim of the study was to establish the usefulness of preservation of the stapedius tendon and the incudo-stapedial joint during the surgical procedure for the treatment of otosclerosis, to find out the advantages of neo-stapedotomy over standard stapedotomy and to compare the hearing improvement in neo-stapedotomy and stapedotomy.

Methods: A prospective, randomised, controlled study with a sample size of 150 patients (ears) presented with pure conductive deafness, paracusis willisii and tinnitus was done. The patients were divided in to group A (n=60) &and group B (n=90), where neo-stapedotomy and standard stapedotomy procedure were performed respectively. Pure tone audiometry and tympanometry were done both pre and postoperatively. Speech discrimination score (SDS) and loudness discomfort levels (LDL) were measured at 3 months postoperatively.   

Results: Postoperative hearing improvement in both groups was almost identical. Improvement in middle ear compliance was marginally more in group A patients. Stapedial reflex could be elicited in 72 % of the patients in group A, but remained absent in group B, at 3 month post-operatively. The SDS became worse with more than 20 dB suprathreshold sounds in group B patients whereas it was maintained even with 80 dB in most patients of group A. Post-operative mean LDL for both pure tone and speech frequency in group A patients were higher than those in group B.  

Conclusions: The difference of SDS and LDL between two groups were statistically significant. Hence, neo-stapedotomy is a better procedure, as no postoperative pseudo-recruitment ‘rollover’ observed and also dynamic range of hearing increased.

Author Biography

Sabyasachi Gon, Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences, RKMSP, Kolkata, West Bengal

Associate professor

Dept. of E.N.T. & Head and Neck surgery

Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences



Rekha S, Ramalingam R, Parani M. Pedigree Analysis and Audiological Investigations of Otosclerosis: An Extended Family Based Study. J Audiol Otol. 2018;22(4):223-8.

Kapur YP, Patt AJ. Otosclerosis in South India. Acta Otolaryngol. 1966;61:353-60.

Kameswaran S, Kumar PV, Jeyapaul JI, Manoharan S. Audiological and haematological studies on the Todas of Nilgiris. J Laryngol Otol. 1976;90:325-33.

Kessel J. Uber das Mobilisieren des Steigbugels durch Ausschneiden des Trommelfelles, Hammers und Amboss bei undurchgangigkeit der Tuba. Arch Obrenh. 1878;13:69.

Lempert J. Improvement of hearing in cases of otosclerosis: New one-stage technique. Arch Otol. 1938;28:42.

Rosen S. Palpation of stapes for fixation: Preliminary procedure to determine fenestration suitability for otosclerosis. Arch Otol. 1952;56:610.

Shea JJ. Fenestration of the oval window. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1958;67:932.

Colletti V, Fiorino FG. Stapedotomy with stapedius tendon preservation: technique and long-term results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;111:181-8.

Simmons FB and Beatty DL: A theory of middle ear function at moderate sound levels. Science. 1962;138:590.

Simmons FB, Alto P. Perceptual theories of middle ear muscle function. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1964;73:723-39.

McCandless GA, Schumacher MA: Auditory dysfunction with facial paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol. 1979;105:271-5.

McCandless, Goering DM. Changes in loudness after stapedectomy. Arch Otolaryngol. 1974;100:344-50.

Chaldwell DL, Greenberg HJ. Speech intelligibility in stapedectomised individuals. Am J Otol. 1979;103-8.

Girgis IH: Preservation of the stapedius tendon in stapes surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1966;80:733-42.

Roychaudhuri BK, Ray P, Bhattacharya M. Classical Neo-stapedotomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;53(3):203-6.

Rasmy E: Stapedius reflex after stapedectomy with preservation of the stapedius tendon. J Laryngol Otol. 1986;100(5):521-7.

Silverstein H, Hester TO, Rosenberg SI, Deems DA: Preservation of the stapedius in laser stapes surgery. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(10):1453-8.

Gros A, Zargi M, Vatovec J. Does it make sense to preserve the stapedial muscle during surgical treatment for otosclerosis? J Laryngol Otol. 2000;114(12): 930-4.

Meurman O, Aantaa E. Stapes muscle reflex after interposition operation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1965;59:345.

Karjalainen S, Harma R, Karja J. Results of stapes operation with preservation of the stapedius muscle tendon. Acta Otolaryngol. 1983;96(1-2):113-7.

Causse JB. Stapedius tendon reconstruction. American Otolaryngology Society Meeting, Orlando, FL, May 1996.

Hilding DA. The protective value of the stapedius reflex: an experimental study. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1961;65:297-307.

Silverstein H, Hester TO, Deems D, Rosenberg S, Crosby N, Kwiatkowski T. Outcomes after laser stapedotomy with and without preservation of the stapedius tendon. Ear Nose Throat. 1999;78(12):923-8.






Original Research Articles