DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20205067

Prospective study on technique of graft fishing with anterior tucking in type 1 tympanoplasty and its hearing outcome

Digant Patni, Ankit Mishra, Dinesh Patel, Vishal R. Munjal

Abstract


Background: Chronic otitis media (COM) is a common health problem in developing world and has a major impact on patient in the form of hearing loss. Temporalis fascia is commonest graft material used for tympanoplasty as it is readily available through same post aural incision. The study was conducted with an aim to find out the effectiveness of fishing technique and anterior tucking in terms of graft stability, graft uptake, hearing improvement and complications.

Methods: The present study is prospective study conducted on patients with complains of otorrhea and hearing loss, of age between 15 to 60 years, during the period January 2017 to June 2018. Patients with inactive mucosal COM and pure conductive hearing loss who underwent type-I tympanoplasty were included. Patients with cholesteatoma, ossicular pathology, trauma, mixed or sensorineural hearing loss, were excluded. Paired ‘t’ test was applied to compare preoperative and postoperative mean air-bone gap.

Results: In our study total 123 patients were analysed for the follow-up period of 6 months and it was observed that graft was well accepted in 93.5% patients while in 4.8% patients residual anterior perforation was found and in 1.7% patients the graft was completely rejected, showing an overall success rate at the end of 6 months follow-up to be 93.5%. There was a statistically significant improvement in hearing gain at the end of 6 months follow-up (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia graft using fishing and anterior tucking technique gave good dimensional stability to graft, preventing lateralization / medialization of graft. The superiorly based circumferential flap allowed for 360 degree placement of graft and anterior tucking, with overall high success rate and lower rate of complications and graft rejection.


Keywords


Tympanoplasty, Temporalis fascia, Post aural incision, COM, Air bone gap, Anterior tucking tympanoplasty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Matsuda Y, Kurita T, Ueda Y, Ito S, Nakashima T. Effect of tympanic membrane perforation on middle-ear sound transmission. J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 2009;31:81-9.

Adoga A, Nimkur T, Silas O. Chronic suppurative otitis media: Socio-economic implications in a tertiary hospital in Northern Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2010;4:3.

Vrabec JT, Deskin RW, Grady JJ. Meta-analysis of pediatric tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(5):530-4.

Patil BC, Misale PR, Mane RS, Mohite AA. Outcome of Interlay Grafting in Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Large Central Perforation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66:418-24.

Olusesi AD, Opaluwah E, Hassan SB. Subjective and objective outcomes of tympanoplasty surgery at National Hospital Abuja, Nigeria 2005-2009. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268:367-72.

Wullestien H. Theory and practice of myringoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1956; 66:1076-93.

Sergi B, Galli J, DeCorso E, Parrilla C, Paludetti G. Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011;31:366-71.

Mishra P, Sonkhya N, Mathur N. Prospective study of 100 cases of underlay tympanoplasty with superiorly based circumferential flap for subtotal perforation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2007;59:225-8.

Gerlinger I, Rath G, Szanyi I et al.Myringoplasty for anterior subtotal perforation using KTP-532 laser. Eur Arch otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263:816-19.

Kazikdas KC, onal K,Boyraz I, Karabiulut E. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforation:a comparision with temporalis fascia technique. Eur Arch otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:985-9.

Demirpehlivan IA, Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Songu M, Ciger E, Can N. Comparision of different tympanic membrane reconstruction technique in type I tympanoplasty. Eur Arch otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268:471-4.

Indorewala S, Pagare R, Aboojiwala S, Barpande S. Dimensional stability of the free fascia grafts:A human study. The Laryngoscope. 2004;114:543-7.

Indorewala S, Adedeji TO, Indorewala A, Nemade G. Tympanoplasty outcomes: a review of 789 cases. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2015;27(79):101-08.

Batni G, Goyal R. Hearing outcome after type I tympanoplasty: a retrospective study. Indain J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015;67(1):39-42.

Gamra OB, Nacef I, Romdhane N, et al. Tympanoplasty outcomes in dry and wet ears. Otolaryngol Open J. 2016;2(2):51-7.

Patil BC, Misale PR, Mane RS, Mohite AA. Outcome of interlay grafting in type I tympanoplasty for large central perforation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66(4):418-24.

Hosamani P, Ananth L, Medikeri SB. Comparative study of efficacy of graft placement with and without anterior tagging in type I tympanoplasty for mucosal type chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol. 2012;126(2):125-30.

Murugendrappa MA, Siddappa PN, Shambulingegowda A, Basavaraj GP. Comparative Study of Two Different Myringoplasty Techniques in Mucosal Type of Chronic Otitis Media. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(2):MC01-3.

Sengupta A, Basak B, Ghosh D, Basu D, Adhikari D, Maity K. A study on outcome of underlay, overlay and combined technique of myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;64(1):63-66.

Rathi A, Gite V, Bhargava S, Shetty N. A comparative study of superiorly based circumferential tympanomeatal flap tympanoplasty with anteriorly anchoring flap tympanoplasty in large, subtotal, and anterior tympanic membrane central perforations in chronic suppurative otitis media of mucosal type. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;4:432-9.

Vartiainen E, Nuutinen J. Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: follow up study of 404 cases. Am J Otol. 1993;14:301-5.

Ahad SH. Myringoplasty by homologous temporalis fascia. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;38:28-9.

Yung MW. Myringoplasty for subtotal perforation. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1995;20:241-5.

Landa Aranzábal M, Rodríguez García L, Rivas Salas A, Navarro Sampedro JJ, Camacho Arrioaga JJ, Algaba Guimera J. Myringoplasty: Onlay vs. underlay. Review of 460 cases. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1996;47:21-5.