DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20202779

Reinforced temporalis fascia with conchal cartilage versus exclusive temporalis fascia grafting in type 1 tympanoplasty: a comparative study

Rahul S. Gosavi, Shishir D. Gosavi, Digwijay A. Bandgar, Akash D. Gupta, Pradny S. Naik, Kshipra M. Narkhede

Abstract


Background: Various grafting materials have been used for the repair of a tympanic membrane perforation over the years, with temporalis fascia and conchal cartilage being the most widely used. Our study is an attempt to compare and analyse the use of exclusive temporalis fascia as grafting material against a reinforced graft consisting of temporalis fascia and conchal cartilage.

Methods: This is a prospective study of 100 patients having inactive mucosal chronic otitis media with a dry central perforation with moderate conductive hearing loss, undergoing type 1 tympanoplasty using underlay technique. 50% of the subjects were grafted with temporalis fascia alone while a reinforced temporalis fascia graft along with conchal cartilage was used in the remaining 50% of the cases. The results were evaluated at an interval of 24 weeks after surgery on the basis of graft uptake and hearing restoration (closure of air-bone gap <10 dB).  

Results: Graft uptake in exclusive temporalis fascia grafting was 86% while it was 94% when a reinforced graft was used; the hearing restoration rates in both the groups were 82% and 80% respectively.   

Conclusions: Reinforced temporalis fascia grafting along with conchal cartilage gives better results than grafting with temporalis fascia alone as regards to graft uptake, while the audiometric results are comparable in both the groups.   


Keywords


Tympanoplasty, Temporalis fascia, Conchal cartilage, Reinforced temporalis fascia with conchal cartilage

Full Text:

PDF

References


Storrs LA. Myringoplasty with the Use of Fascia Grafts. Arch Otolaryngol. 1961;74(1):45-9.

Gerber MJ, Mason JC, Lambert PR. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(12):1994-9.

Linde RE. The cartilage-perichondrium graft in the treatment of posterior tympanic membrane retraction pockets. Laryngoscope. 1973;83(5):747-53.

Berthold E. Uber Myringoplastic. Med-chir Central. 1879;14:195-207.

Zollner F. Panel of myringoplasty, second workshop on reconstructive middle ear surgery. Arch Otol. 1963;78:301.

Yetiser S, Tosun F, Satar B. Revision myringoplasty with solvent-dehydrated human dura mater (Tutoplast). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;124(5):518-21.

Tabb HG. Closure of perforations of the tympanic membrane by vein grafts. A preliminary report of twenty cases. Laryngoscope. 1960;70:271-86.

Yung M. Cartilage tympanoplasty: literature review. J Laryngol Otol. 2008;122(7):663-72.

Committe on Conservation of Hearing, American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. Standard classification for surgery of chronic ear disease. Arch Otol. 1965;81:204.

Gondela HK, Veeraswamy NDA. A comparative study between the two different graft materials used in tympanoplasty surgery in term of post-operative graft uptake and hearing improvement. International Journal of scientific research. 2016;5(8):77-8.

Dabholkar JP, Vora K, Sikdar A. Comparative study of underlay tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia and tragal perichondrium. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;59(2):116-9.

Strahan RW, Ward P, Acquirelli M, Jafek B. Tympanic Membrane Grafting Analysis of material and techniques. Annals Otology. 1971;80:854-60.

Rout MR, Mohanty D, Das CP, Prasad PV. Temporalis fascia graft versus composite graft in chronic suppurative otitis media with subtotal and total perforations. Indian J Otol. 2018;24:23-7.

Singh SP, Nagi RS, Singh J. A Comparative Evaluation of Audiological and Graft Uptake Results of Reinforced Sliced Conchal Cartilage Versus Temporalis Muscle Fascia Graft in Type I Tympanoplasty. Int J Clin Exp Otolaryngol. 2018;4(1):96-100.

Iacovou E, Vlastarakos PV, Papacharalampous G, Kyrodimos E, Nikolopoulos TP. Is cartilage better than temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty? Implications for current surgical practice. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(11):2803-13.

Yu L, Han C, Yu H, Yu D. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou. Ke Xue Za Zhi. 2001;36(3):166-8.

Pradhan P, Anant A, Venkatachalam VP. Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Full-Thickness Cartilage Palisades in Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty for Large/Subtotal Perforations. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;29(91):63-8.