Relationship of chronic rhinosinusitis with dental malocclusion: a prospective study

Authors

  • Jayant K. Sonone Department of ENT, MGIMS, Sevagram, Maharashtra, India http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-0283
  • Gaurav S. Tikar Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tuljai Multicare Hospital, Khamgaon, Maharashtra, India
  • Pallavi G. Thakare Department of Dental Surgery, VYWS Dental College and Hospital, Amaravati, Maharashtra, India
  • Sushil N. Meshram Department of ENT, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20202215

Keywords:

Dental malocclusion, Maxillary sinusitis, Angles classification, Chronic sinusitis

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to find the effect of chronic rhinosinusitis on dental malocclusion.  A malocclusion is defined as an irregularity of the teeth or a mal relationship of the dental arches beyond the range of what is accepted as normal. Malocclusion may not be life-threatening, but it is an important public health issue as it compromises the health of oral tissues and also can lead to psychological and social problems. There are numerous studies in the literature about prevalence of the dental malocclusion but there is no study regarding association of CRS and malocclusion. Several factors related to malocclusion, such as anterior crowding, midline malalignment, and facial asymmetry, have strong effects on the perception of facial aesthetics, which influence the psychological development and in turn, influence social acceptance and self‑perception.

Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted from September 2015 to August 2017 and 57 patients with diagnosis of having chronic sinusitis, were evaluated for dental occlusion. Malocclusion is then classified by angle’s classification.  

Results: Most patients of chronic rhinosinusitis had dental malocclusion in grade II, followed by grade I, then     grade III.

Conclusions: While treating the patients of CRS one must keep in mind that he may have class II malocclusion which may cause gum disease, poor oral hygiene, impaired speech, mastication and aesthetics of face and need orthodontics management as well.

Author Biographies

Jayant K. Sonone, Department of ENT, MGIMS, Sevagram, Maharashtra, India

Assistant Professor, Department of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery

Gaurav S. Tikar, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tuljai Multicare Hospital, Khamgaon, Maharashtra, India

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Pallavi G. Thakare, Department of Dental Surgery, VYWS Dental College and Hospital, Amaravati, Maharashtra, India

Department of Dental Surgery

Sushil N. Meshram, Department of ENT, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India

Junior Resident, Department of ENT

References

Walther DP, Houston WJB, Jones ML, Oliver RG. Walther and Houston’s orthodontic notes. 5th edition. Wright, Oxford; 1994.

Taibah, Hummayani SA, Mohammed F. Effect of malocclusion on the self-esteem of adolescents. J Oorthodontic Sci. 2017;6:123.

Arcis BC, Company MJM, Silla AJM. Psychosocial impact of malocclusion in Spanish adolescents. Korean J Orthod. 2013;43:193‑200.

Jung MH. An evaluation of self‑esteem and quality of life in orthodontic patients: effects of crowding and protrusion. Angle Orthod. 2015;85:812‑9.

Vaida L, Pirte A, Corega C, Slavescu D, Mutiu G. Correlations between the changes in patients’ dental‑facial morphology at the end of the orthodontic treatment and the psychological variables. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2009;50:625‑9.

Badran SA. The effect of malocclusion and self‑perceived aesthetics on the self‑esteem of a sample of Jordanian adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:638‑44.

Perillo L, Esposito M, Caprioglio A, Attanasio S, Santini AC, Carotenuto M. Orthodontic treatment need for adolescents in the Campania region: The malocclusion impact on self‑concept. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:353‑9.

Phillips C, Beal KN. Self‑concept and the perception of facial appearance in children and adolescents seeking orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:12‑6.

Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos. 1899;41:248-64.

Cho SH. Factors for Maxillary Sinus Volume and Craniofacial Anatomical Features in Adults with Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(6):610-5.

Fiske J, Davis DM, Frances C, Gelbier S. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. Br Dent J. 1998;184(2):90-3.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-22

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles