Comparitive study between button-hole tympanoplasty and tympanoplasty with placement of graft lateral to handle of malleus with or without cortical mastoidectomy in mucosal type of chronic otitis media

Authors

  • J. Mansoor Ahmed Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck, Combined Hospitals of MCH, Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Ballari, Karnataka, India
  • Panchami . Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck, Combined Hospitals of MCH, Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Ballari, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20201689

Keywords:

Buttonhole tympanoplasty, Placement of graft lateral to handle of malleus, Pure tone audiometry, Chronic otitis media, Underlay technique

Abstract

Background: Various techniques of underlay graft placement have been described in literature. In this study we compare two simple underlay techniques of temporalis fascia graft placement that is Buttonhole tympanoplasty and tympanoplasty with placement of graft lateral to handle of malleus in mucosal type of chronic otitis media patients undergoing tympanoplasty to find out which among the two is a better technique based on the audiological improvement post-operatively.

Methods: This is a case series study which included 30 patients undergoing type-1 tympanoplasty. Group A with 15 patients underwent Buttonhole tympanoplasty and Group B with 15 patients underwent tympanoplasty with placement of graft lateral to handle of malleus.  

Results: Post-operative hearing improvement was assessed after duration of three months. In Group A, 13 (87%) patients showed hearing within normal limits and 2 (13%) patients showed mild conductive hearing loss. In Group B, 9 (60%) patients showed hearing within normal limits and 6 (40%) of patients showed mild conductive hearing loss. Both the techniques were statistically significant.

Conclusions: Both the techniques mentioned are simple and effective procedures. Buttonhole tympanoplasty was considered as superior technique among the two as the handle of malleus provides better anchoring for the temporalis fascia graft, intra-operative manoeuvring of the graft is easier without causing displacement of the graft, there is no reduction in the middle ear space and post-operative hearing improvement is excellent. When the handle of malleus is eroded surgeon can perform tympanoplasty with placement of graft lateral to handle of malleus.

References

Browning GG. Aetiopathology of inflammatory of inflammatory condition of the external and middle ear. In: Kerr AG, editor. Scott-Browns Otolaryngology. 6th ed. London: Arnold; 1997: 3396-3397.

Schuknecht HF. Pathology of the ear. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1993: 191-253.

Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part II: the study. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:26-36.

Stage J, Pedersen BK. Underlay tympanoplasty with the graft lateral to the malleus handle. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1992;17:6-9.

Shankar G, Narendranath A. Button Hole Tympanoplasty. Res Otolaryngol. 2014;3(5):81-83.

Yawn RJ, Carlson ML, Haynes DS, Rivas A. Lateral-to-Malleus Underlay Tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(10):1809-12.

World Health Organization. World Health Organization International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities Handicap. WHO: Geneva; 1980.

Shetty S. Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Assessment of Hearing following Tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck. 2011;64(4):377-81.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-21

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles