DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20200635

Comparative study on the effect of various anterior nasal packing on ear compliance and ear canal volume

Jayeeta Pandit, Vignesh Kumar, Amlanjyoti Nath, Abhinandan Bhattacharjee

Abstract


Background: Anterior nasal packing (ANP) is a commonly used procedure by otorhinolaryngologist for the control of post-operative bleeding post septoplasty and nasal surgery. However there remains an ambiguity regarding the effect of various nasal packings on the Eustachian tube dysfunctions. The present study intends to compare and evaluate the effects of ribbon gauge nasal packing (RNP), merocel nasal packing (MNP) and merocel with airway packing (MAP) on the eustachian dysfunction such as changes in the compliance and ear canal volume.

Methods: Ninety patients were selected for the study, and randomly divided into 3 groups of 30 patients each where the patients were treated with RNP, MNP and MAP. The pack was kept insitu for 48 hrs and the compliance and ear canal volume was measured at before pack is applied (pre pack), with ANP insitu at 48 hrs (with pack), and after removal of the nasal pack at 5th day (post pack).  

Results: The percentage of patients with abnormal compliance level as well as ear canal volume was found to be the highest among the patients in RNP group followed by patients from the MNP group. The least number of patients with abnormal compliance and ear canal volume was observed among the patients in the MAP groups.

Conclusions: MAPs are better than ribbon gauge and MNPs in terms of maintaining the compliance level and ear canal volume.

 


Keywords


Anterior nasal packing, Compliance, Ear canal volume

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dutta S, Mukherjee A, Saha J, Biswas G, Haldar D, Sen I, et al. Modified technique of anterior nasal packing: a comparative study report. Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India. 2012;64(4):341-5.

Pandurangarao SU, Murugendrappa MA, Jonnalagadda DK, Panicker R, Janarthanan S. A comparative study between conventional nasal packing versus nasal splint with clip after septoplasty with bilateral reduction of inferior turbinates with bipolar cautery. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;4(4):1-4.

Naik SM, Appaji M, Ravishankar S, Goutham M, Devi NP, Naik SS. Anterior nasal packing in nasal surgeries and epistaxis: advantages of nasal tampon over conventional framycetin ribbon packs. Otolaryngol Online J. 2014;4(1):1-18.

Naik SM, Ravishankar B, Shashikumar T, Deekshith T, Sherry C, Pooja N. et al. Teflon nasal splints in nasal surgeries: advantages over conventional nasal packing. Online J Otolaryngol. 2014;4(4):21-4.

Thomas I, Thekkethil JS, Kapoor RC, Thomas T, Thomas P. A Novel Technique of Using Sponge as Post-Operative Nasal Packing. Bengal J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;26(1):23-8.

Nanda MS, Kaur M, Bhatia S. Impact of Septoplasty on hearing and middle ear function. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;6(1):135-8.

Mohan C, Srivastav A, Shukla P. Effect of Nasal Packing on Middle Ear Pressure. Int J Adv Integ Med Sci. 2016;1(2):52-6.

Luers JC, Huttenbrink KB. Surgical anatomy and pathology of the middle ear. J Anatomy. 2016;228(2):338-53.

Weber RK. Nasal packing and stenting. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;8:2-5.

Thompson AC, Crowther JA. Effect of nasal packing on eustachian tube function. J Laryngol Otol. 1991;105(7):539-40.

Flohr C, Lee KK, Varma S. Merocel nasal packing with airway: a method to help secure full-thickness skin grafts on the nasal tip. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162(1):209-10.

Kaur J, Singh M, Kaur I, Singh A, Goyal S. A comparative study of gloved versus ungloved merocel (R) as nasal pack after septoplasty. Nigerian J Clin Pract. 2018;21(11):1391-5.

Jung YJ, Choi YW, Nam SH. The usefulness of airway tube Merocel (R) on treatment of nasal bone fracture. J Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2009;10(1):14-8.