DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20200629

Recent trends in bacteriological and antibiogram profile of isolates from ear, nose and throat in a tertiary care hospital in coastal Karnataka

Jyoti ., Ravishankara Bhat S., Madhumitha Srinivasan

Abstract


Background: The objectives were to study the bacterial pathogens of ear, nose and throat (ENT), to determine the culture and sensitivity pattern of ENT infections in coastal Karnataka.

Methods: A retrospective culture and sensitivity profiling study of 109 samples from September 2018 to September 2019 was done in Department of ENT in KVG Medical College and Hospital.  

Results: Among the pure growth, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in majority of samples (27.77%) followed by Staphylococcus aureus (22.9%). Klebsiella sp., Acinetobacter sp., Citrobacter, Non enterococcus, Escherichia coli, Proteus sp. and Streptococcus pneumoniae were responsible for remaining samples. Among S. aureus majority was MRSA accounting for 18.51%. P. aeruginosa was most sensitive to amikacin, ceftazidime, meropenem and piperacillin- tazobactam and least sensitive to cotrimoxazole and colistin and most resistant to sparfloxacin, cefaperazone-sulbactam, ceftriaxone-tazobactam and clindamycin. MRSA was most sensitive to gentamicin, amikacin and clindamycin and most resistant to cephalexin, ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Klebsiella sp. was most sensitive to amikacin and cotrimoxazole and most resistant to sparfloxacin and ceftriaxone. E. coli was most sensitive to gentamicin and cotrimoxazole and most resistant to sparfloxacin.

Conclusions: P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and Klebsiella sp. represent majority of culture samples. With ever changing culture & sensitivity pattern and rising antibiotic resistance, a simple step of sending pus samples for the same will help in personalizing the treatment, thereby reducing the disease burden. 


Keywords


ENT, Culture sensitivity, Changing pattern

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anitha M., Pratikshia K., Mohamed SA., Vijay M. Prevalence of Bacterial Growth in Throat Swab Culture. Int. Res. J. Biological Sci. 2016;5(5):14-7.

Estifanos T, Mesele A, Meseret C. Microbiological assessment of gram negative bacterial isolates from ear, eye, throat and nose among patients attending Aresho advanced medical laboratory, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Trop Med. 2019;14(1):11-6.

Edwin B, Prasanna V, Kannan I, Katiyar VMH, Dhanapal E. Incidence of bacterial colonization in the oropharynx of patients with ear, nose and throat infections. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3:931-4.

Patel B, Panchal P, Patel D, Vegad M. A Study of Bacteriological Profile and Their Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Isolated Organisms from ICU's. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2016;7(3):25-9.

Selvaraj R, Chakrapani CH, Pathapati RM, Buchineni M. Antibacterial susceptible pattern of ear, nose and throat in paediatric patient infections. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2017;6:1900-3.

Ahmad MM, Kurawa ZM, Shu’aibu, Yahaya G. Microbiological Assessment of Bacterial Isolates from Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Among Patients Attending Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital. Nig J of Bas & App Sci.2016;24(1):15-8.

Kumar RP, Sriyasteva M, Sharma S, Rishi PS, Nwawan P. Isolation and Antimicrobial Sensitivity profile of Bacterial Agents in Chronic Supportive Otitis media in patients at NIMS Hospital, Jaipur. J Res Nursing Midwifery, 2013;2(5):265-9.

Osazuwa F, Nwofor Q, Ibeh IN. Etiologic Agents of Otitis Media in Benin City, Nigeria. Res J Med Sci. 2011;5(2):112-5.

Patricia MT. Overview of Bacterial identification methods and strategies In: Bailey and Scott’s Diagnostic microbiology, 13th ed. St louie, Mosby; 2014: 193-231.

Patricia MT. Laboratory methods and strategies for antimicrobial susceptibility testing In: Bailey and Scott’s Diagnostic microbiology, 13th ed. St louie, Mosby; 2014: 168-192.