DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20194926

Graft uptake and post-operative hearing outcome with type-I tympanoplasty in dry versus wet ear: a comparative study

Kulwinder Singh Sandhu, Puneet Kaur, Jagdeepak Singh, Sania Arya

Abstract


Background: The discharging ear presents the otologist with the dilemma of operating on it or not. This study is being undertaken to study and compare the results of type I tympanoplasty in dry ear (no ear discharge at the time of surgery) and wet ear (culture negative consistent ear discharge at the time of surgery).

Methods: 50 patients of either sex aged between 18 to 50 years undergoing type-I tympanoplasty were included in the study on the basis of pre-determined clinical criteria. Type I tympanoplasty was performed using temporalis fascia graft by underlay technique. Post-operative data regarding graft uptake and hearing improvement was recorded in the follow up period of three months.  

Results: The complete graft uptake was there in 88% of the patients in group 1 and 84% patients in group 2. The difference in the two groups was statistically insignificant (p>0.05). The mean pre-operative pure tone average in group 1 was 30.57±7.80 dB while post-operative pure tone average was 20.68±8.22 dB with a mean hearing gain of 9.89 dB. The mean pre-operative pure tone average in group 2 was 35.21±5.98 dB while the post-operative pure tone average was 27.07±9.25 dB with a mean hearing gain of 8.12 dB. There was marked hearing improvement in both the groups post operatively (p<0.001 i.e., highly significant). When hearing improvement was compared between two groups there was no significant statistical difference (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The outcome is equally good for type 1 tympanoplasty in dry and wet ear in safe (mucosal) type of chronic suppurative otitis media with respect to graft uptake and hearing improvement.


Keywords


Wet ear, Type 1 tympanoplasty, Temporalis fascia

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHOCIBA Foundation workshop. Prevention of hearing impairment from chronic otitis media. WHO/PDH/98.4. London, UK: CIBA Foundation; 1996.

Browning GG. Aetiopathology of inflammatory conditions of the external and middle ear. Scott-Brown’s Otolaryngol. 1997;3:15-28.

Krishnan A, Reddy EK, Nalinesha KM, Jagannath PM. Tympanoplasty with or without cortical mastoidectomy-a comparative study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;54(3):195-8.

Ballenger JJ, Snow JB. Ballenger's otorhinolaryngology: head and neck surgery. Shelton, USA: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2003.

Brackmann D, Shelton C, Arriaga MA. Otologic Surgery. 3rd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2015: 119-60.

Nagle SK, Jagade MV, Gandhi SR, Pawar PV. Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in dry and wet ear. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;61(2):138-40.

Thakur SK, Singh SK, Afaque A, Ghimire N. Outcome of type 1 tympanoplasty: an experience at Biratnagar eye hospital in Eastern Nepal. Asian J Med Sci. 2015;7(2):55-60.

Shetty S. Pre-operative and post-operative assessment of hearing following tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;64(4):377-81.

Mills R, Thiel G, Mills N. Results of myringoplasty operations in active and inactive ears in adults. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(9):2245-9.

Dhar G, Basak B, Chandra Gayen G, Ray R. Outcome of myringoplasty in dry and wet ear–a comparative study. J Dental Med Sci. 2014;13:2279.

Hosny S, El-Anwar MW, Abd-Elhady M, Khazbak A, El Feky A. Outcomes of myringoplasty in wet and dry ears. J Int Adv Otol. 2014;10(3):256.

Shankar R, Virk RS, Gupta K, Gupta AK, Bal A, Bansal S. Evaluation and comparison of type I tympanoplasty efficacy and histopathological changes to the tympanic membrane in dry and wet ear: a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129(10):945-9.