DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20192630

Anatomical variations of sphenoid sinus among patients undergoing computed tomography of paranasal sinus

Bhanu Pratap Singh, Rajendra Basayya Metgudmath, Divya Singh, Udit Saxena

Abstract


Background: The approach to sphenoid sinus still remains a clinical challenge, despite the arrival of endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The complex and variable anatomy of the sphenoid sinus can be difficult to appreciate with standard axial or coronal CT images of the sinus. The study was done with the objective to study the anatomy of the sphenoid sinus and its variations, and to compare the prevalence of variants obtained in our study with the reported cases in the literature.

Methods: The CT scans of 168 normal slides obtained from 84 patients with paranasal sinus were analysed using triplanar imaging provided by 64-slice spiral CT. The prevalence of each of the sphenoid sinus variation was also analysed.  

Results: Results showed that the prevalence of pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process, greater wing of the sphenoid, and the pterygoid process was 17.85%, 22.61% and 32.14%, respectively. Protrusion of the internal carotid artery, optic nerve, maxillary nerve, and the vidian nerve was 47.61%, 36.90%, 25% and 26.19%, respectively. Dehiscence of internal carotid artery, optic nerve, maxillary nerve, and the vidian nerve was 30.95%, 29.76%, 14.28% and 22.61%, respectively. The prevalence of pneumatization in the Onodi cells was seen in 17.85% of the cases. Association of septa with an internal carotid artery was seen in 29.7% of the cases. Septa attachment to the optic nerve was also observed in 27.3% of the cases.

Conclusions: The triplanar imaging (section thickness of 1 mm) is a better three-dimensional image of the sphenoid sinus, compared to coronal imaging. Triplanar imaging guides the surgical approach of the sphenoid sinus with mentally reconstructed three-dimensional images.

 


Keywords


Anatomical variations, Sphenoid sinus, Computed tomography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Teatini G, Simonetti G, Salvolini U, Masala W, Meloni F, Rovasio S, et al. Computed tomography of the ethmoid labyrinth and adjacent structures. Annals Otol, Rhinol, Laryngol. 1987;96(3):239-50.

Elwany S, Elsaeid I, Thabet H. Endoscopic anatomy of the sphenoid sinus. J Laryngol Otol. 1999;113(2):122-6.

Sirikci A, Bayazit YA, Bayram M, Mumbuc S, Gungor K, Kanlikama M. Variations of sphenoid and related structures. European Radiol. 2000;10(5):844-8.

Bolger WE, Butzin CA, Parsons DS. Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(1):56-64.

Sataloff RT, Gullane PJ, Goldstein DP. Sataloff's Comprehensive Textbook of Otolaryngology: Head & Neck Surgery. JP Medical Ltd; 2015.

Kazkayasi M, Karadeniz Y, Arikan OK. Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus on computed tomography. Rhinol. 2005;43(2):109-14.

Unal B, Bademci G, Bilgili YK, Batay F, Avci E. Risky anatomic variations of sphenoid sinus for surgery. SRA. 2006;28(2):195-201.

DeLano MC, Fun FY, Zinreich SJ. Relationship of the optic nerve to the posterior paranasal sinuses: a CT anatomic study. AJNR. 1996;17(4):669-75.

Earwaker J. Anatomic variants in sinonasal CT. RSNA. 1993;13(2):381-415.

Hewaidi G, Omami G. Anatomic Variation of Sphenoid Sinus and Related Structures in Libyan Population: CT Scan Study. Libyan J Med. 2008;3(3):128-33.

Kasemsiri P, Solares CA, Carrau RL, Prosser JD, Prevedello DM, Otto BA, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approaches: anatomical landmarks for planning the surgical corridor. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(4):811-5.

Sethi DS, Stanley RE, Pillay PK. Endoscopic anatomy of the sphenoid sinus and sella turcica. J Laryngol Otol. 1995;109(10):951-5.

Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ, Hassab MH. The internal carotid artery as it relates to endonasal sphenoethmoidectomy. American J Rhinol. 1990;4(1):7-12.

Sareen D, Agarwal A, Kaul J, Sethi A. Study of sphenoid sinus anatomy in relation to endoscopic surgery. Int J Morphol. 2005;23(3):261-6.

Dessi P, Moulin G, Castro F, Chagnaud C, Cannoni M. Protrusion of the optic nerve into the ethmoid and sphenoid sinus: prospective study of 150 CT studies. Neuroradiol. 1994;36(7):515-6.

Rahmati A, Ghafari R, AnjomShoa M. Normal Variations of Sphenoid Sinus and the Adjacent Structures Detected in Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Dentistry. 2016;17(1):32-7.

Anusha B, Baharudin A, Philip R, Harvinder S, Shaffie BM, Ramiza RR. Anatomical variants of surgically important landmarks in the sphenoid sinus: a radiologic study in Southeast Asian patients. SRA. 2015;37(10):1183-90.

Fujii K, Chambers SM, Rhoton AL, Jr. Neurovascular relationships of the sphenoid sinus. A microsurgical study. J Neurosurg. 1979;50(1):31-9.

Sofferman RA. Harris P. Mosher Award thesis. The recovery potential of the optic nerve. Laryngoscope. 1995;105(7):1-38.

Tomovic S, Esmaeili A, Chan NJ, Shukla PA, Choudhry OJ, Liu JK, et al. High-resolution computed tomography analysis of variations of the sphenoid sinus. J Neurol Surg. 2013;74(2):82-90.

Lang J, Keller H. The posterior opening of the pterygopalatine fossa and the position of the pterygopalatine ganglion. Gegenbaurs Morphologisches Jahrbuch. 1977;124(2):207-14.

Pandolfo I, Gaeta M, Blandino A, Longo M. The radiology of the pterygoid canal: normal and pathologic findings. American J Neuroradiol. 1987;8(3):479-83.

Fernandez‐Miranda JC, Prevedello DM, Madhok R, Morera V, Barges‐Coll J, Reineman K, et al. Sphenoid septations and their relationship with internal carotid arteries: anatomical and radiological study. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(10):1893-6.

Berjis N, Hashemi SM, Rogha M, Biron MA, Setareh M. Some anatomical variation of paranasal sinuses using sinus endoscopic approach on "cadaver" in Isfahan, Iran. Adv Biomed Res. 2014;3:51.