Effect of nasal surgery on laryngeal mucosa

Authors

  • Yasser Mohammad Hassan Mandour Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Benha University, Egypt
  • Samer Badie Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Benha University, Egypt
  • Mohammad Fahmy Shendy Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Benha University, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20190756

Keywords:

Nasal obstruction, Septoplasty, FESS, Stroboscopy

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to compare stroboscopic features of laryngeal mucosa before and after the nasal surgery.

Methods: Prospective randomized case control study in which 60 patients divided into two groups each include 30 patients, group I with bilateral nasal obstruction due to deviated nasal septum with hypertrophic inferior turbinate, group II bilateral nasal obstruction due nasal polyposis undergoing septoplasty with turbinectomy group I and FESS in group II with video- stroboscopic examination before and 3 months after the surgery for each patient and 30 normal volunteers as a control group.  

Results: Swollen true vocal cord, laryngeal erythema and laryngeal edema were significantly decreased after the nasal surgery, As Swollen true vocal cord changed from 8 to one patient in group I and from 16 to 4 patients in group II, laryngeal erythema changed from 28 to 6 patients in group I and from 29 to 7 patients in group II and laryngeal edema changed from 28 to 5 patients in group I and from 29 to 8 patients in group II.

Conclusions: The nasal surgery would have a significant impact on laryngeal edema, erythema and vocal cord edema.


References

Ozbal-Koc EA, Koc B, Ercan I, Kocak I, Tadihan E, Turgut S. Effects of septoplasty on speech and voice. J Voice. 2014;28(3):393.

De Lábio RB, Tavares ELM, Alvarado RC, Martins RHG. Consequences of Chronic Nasal Obstruction on the Laryngeal Mucosa and Voice Quality of 4- to 12-Year-Old Children. J Voice. 2012;26(4):488-92.

Celik O, Boyaci Z, Yelken K, Atespare A, Celebi S, Koca O. Septorhinoplasty With Spreader Grafts Enhances Perceived Voice Quality Without Affecting Acoustic Characteristics. J Voice. 2012;26(4):493–5.

Broms P, Jonson B, Malm L. Rhinomanometry. IV. A pre- and post-¬operative evaluation in functional septoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol. 1982;94(5-6):523-9.

Bless DM, Hirano M, Feder RJ. Videostrobosco- pic evaluation of the larynx. Ear Nose Throat J. 1987;66:289–96.

Chen MY, Metson R. Effects of sinus surgery on speech. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(8):845-52.

Mora R, Jankowska B, Dellepiane M, Mora F, Crippa B, Salami A. Acoustic features of voice after septoplasty. Med Sci Monit. 2009;15(6):269-73.

Izadi F, Mohseni R, Daneshi A, Sandughdar N. Determination of Fundamental Frequency and Voice Intensity in Iranian Men and Women Aged Between 18 and 45 Years. J Voice. 2012;26(3):336–40.

van-Oene CM, van-Reij EJF, Sprangers MAG, Fokkens WJ. Quality-assessment of disease-specific quality of life questionnaires for rhinitis and rhinosinusitis: a systematic review. Allergy. 2007;62(12):1359–71.

Karimi E, Akbar Bayat A, Ghahari MR, Rahavi-Ezabadi S, Jafari M. Evaluating the Effect of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Laryngeal Mucosa Stroboscopic Features. Iranian J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;30(3).

Yegin Y, Celik M, Simsck BM, Akidil AO, Olgun B, Altintas A, Kayhan FT. Assessment of effects of septoplasty on acoustic parameters of voice: A prospective clinical study. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;54:146-9.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles