DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20191724

Evaluation of facial skeleton fractures

K. S. Gangadhara, Ramesh Sannappa, T. D. Thimmappa, Chaithra B. G.

Abstract


Background: Fracture of facial bone is most common fracture in humans because of its upper and prominent position. Facial skeleton fractures are classified in to various types, nasal bone fractures, maxillary fractures. It affects all age groups and both sexes. The cause to the injury is due to RTA, assault, accidental fall etc. Majority of the times it is associated with the other fractures. Facial skeleton fractures should not be considered as minor injury. They may preclude to serious complications like septal haematoma, orbital injury, brain injury and CSF leak. Majority of them require conservative management. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence and types of facial skeleton fractures in trauma cases for appropriate investigation and treatment for better outcome and to reduce morbidity.

Methods: Prospective clinical study of patients who attend to casualty and ENT department and referred by other departments with facial skeleton fractures are evaluated for the period of 6 months.  

Results: Of 100 patients, 90% were male and 10% female. According to age 1-9 yr: 3%, 10-19 yr: 12%, 30-39 yr: 19%, 40-49 yr: 20%, 50-59 yr: 10%, 60-69 yr: 5% were noted. The most common cause was the road traffic accident (58%) followed by self fall (38%).The most common fracture involved is the nasal bone ( 54%) in isolation, followed by maxilla (23%) and mandible (12%).

Conclusions: The patients were mostly males in third decade of life, victims of the RTA being the most commonly affected. The most commonly fractured bone being nose.


Keywords


Epidemiology, Maxillofacial injuries, Nasal bone

Full Text:

PDF

References


Erol B, Tanrikulu R, Görgün B. Maxillofacial fractures: Analysis of demographic distribution and treatment in 2901 patients (25-year experience) J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2004;32:30.

Bataineh AB. Etiology and incidence of maxillofacial fractures in the north of Jordan. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;86:31–5.

Iida S, Matsuya T. Paediatric maxillofacial fractures: Their aetiological characters and fracture patterns. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2002;30:237–41.

van Hoof RF, Merkx CA, Stekelenburg EC. The different patterns of fractures of the facial skeleton in four European countries. Int J Oral Surg. 1977;6:3–11.

Hogg NJ, Stewart TC, Armstrong JE, Girotti MJ. Epidemiology of maxillofacial injuries at trauma hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 1992 and 1997. J Trauma. 2000;49:425–32.

Klotch DW. Frontal sinus fractures: anterior skull base. Facial Plast Surg. 2000;16:127-34.

Hull AM, Lowe T, Finaly PM. The psychological impact of maxillofacial trauma: an overview to reaction to trauma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95:515-20.

Malara P, Malara B, Drugacz J. Characteristics of maxillofacial injuries resulting from road traffic accidents – a 5year review of case records from department of maxillofacial surgery in Katowice, Poland. Head and face Med. 2006;2:27.

Palma VC, Luz JGC, Correia FAS. Frequency of facial fractures in patients treated at a hospital service. Rev Odontol Univ São Paulo. 1995;9(2):121-6.

Falcão MFL, Segundo AVL, Silveira MMF. Epidemiological study of 1758 facial fractures treated at restaurant hospital, Recife/PE. Rev Bras Cir Traumatol Buco- Maxilo-Fac. 2005;5(3):65-72.

Macedo JLS, Camargo LM, Almeida PF, Rosa SC. Epidemiological profile of face trauma of patients seen at a emergency room in public hospital. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2008;35(1):9-13.

Pereira MD, Kreniski T, Santos RA, Ferreira LM. Craniofacial trauma: epidemiological profile of 1223 fractures treated between 1999 and 2005 in Hospital São Paulo – UNIFESP-EPM. Rev Soc Bras Cir Craniomaxilofac. 2008;11(2):47-50

Susbhraj K, Nandakumar N, Ravindran C. Review of maxillofacial injuries in Chennai, in India: a study of 2748 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45(8):637-9.