DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20184676

Improving the allocation of junior doctor resources using a Pareto analysis of pager activity

Afroze S. Khan, Timothy C. Biggs, Morad Faoury

Abstract


Background: Pareto analysis is the cornerstone of most businesses improvement strategies around the world. It has been used in healthcare as part of quality improvement endeavours. Pager activity can be used as a surrogate to assess the sources and frequency of demands on junior doctor resources. Thus our aim is to analyse and improve the allocation of junior doctor resources through the study of pager calls using the Pareto principle.

Methods: Retrospective observational study examining pager calls to Ear, Nose & Throat junior doctor/residents at the University Hospital Southampton, a tertiary referral centre on the south coast of the United Kingdom. A Pareto principle analysis was undertaken, assessing whether the majority of activity stems from a minority of sources.  

Results: In total, 2853 pager calls were included, averaging 31 pages a day over a three-month period. Highest daily page activity occurred at 11 am and 2 pm. Data conformed to the Pareto principle; 80% of activity came from 22% of sources, with the paediatric department providing the highest demand.

Conclusions: Analysis of pager frequency data has shown confirmation to the Pareto principle, identifying that the majority of calls to the junior doctor/resident originate from a limited number of departments/locations. Such analysis has allowed a restructuring of resources, to better streamline departmental efficiency. A broader appreciation and adoption of Pareto analysis within the healthcare sector would enable improved resource allocation, in an era of limited healthcare budgets.


Keywords


Pareto analysis, Bleeps, Pagers, Paging, ENT, Otolaryngology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Schumpeter JA. Vilfredo Pareto. Q JEcon 1848-1923;63:147-73.

Juran JM, GodfreyAB. Juran’s Quality Handbook. 5th ed. NewYork: McGraw-Hill; 1999.

Kramp, KH, Van Det MJ, Veeger NJ, Pierie JP. The Pareto Analysis for Establishing Content Criteria in Surgical Training. J Surg Educ. 2016;73:892-901.

Kennedy KM, Jennings P, O’Brien N, Glynn LG. Does the “80-20 rule” apply to Healthcare Utilisation, amongst Patients Aged 50 Years and Over, in the West of Ireland? J Family Med Community Health. 2014;1:1009.

Lewis P, McAllen K, West R. Reducing delays in the CT scanning process at Bloomington Hospital. Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1994;6:79-82.

Yousef N, Yousef F. Using total quality management approach to improve patient safety by preventing medication error incidences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:621.

Müller F, Dormann H, Pfistermeister B, Sonst A, Patapovas A, Vogler R, et al. Application of the Pareto principle to identify and address drug-therapy safety issues. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70:727-36.

Carey RG, Teeters JL. CQI case study: reducing medication errors. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1995;21:232-7.

Gershengorn HB, Kocher R, Factor P. Management strategies to effect change in intensive care units: lessons from the world of business. Part II. Quality-improvement strategies. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014;11:444-53.

Erridge P. The Pareto principle. Br Dent J. 2006;201:419.