DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20185071

Interlay versus underlay type 1 tympanoplasty: a comparative study of the techniques in 100 cases

Nitin Sharma, Pritosh Sharma, V. P. Goyal, Kumar Gaurav Sharma

Abstract


Background: Type 1 tympanoplasty is a surgical technique used to restore the integrity of tympanic membrane as well as to improve hearing level in patients with large central perforations (inactive mucosal chronic otitis media).

Methods: This is a randomized prospective study of 12 month duration from January 2017 to December 2017 in 100 patients of chronic otitis media inactive mucosal type with large central perforation admitted in the E.N.T department at Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur.  

Results: The graft uptake rate in the present study was found to be 96% and 90% respectively in interlay and underlay techniques. Post operatively after 12 weeks mean air bone gap was maximum reduced in Interlay tympanoplasty.

Conclusions: The present study showed that Interlay technique had a better graft take rate as well as hearing improvement in large central perforation of chronic otitis media than the underlay technique.


Keywords


Chronic otitis media, Interlay, Underlay, Type 1 tympanoplasty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Galdstone HB, Jackler RK, Varav K. Tympanic Membrane Wound Healing. An Overview. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995;28(5):913–32.

Berthold E. Overlay myringoplasty Wier Med Bull. 1878;1:627.

Wullstein H. Theory and practice of tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1956;66:1076-93.

Zollner F. The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol. 1955;69:637-52.

Aslam MA, Aslam MJ. Comparison of Over-Underlay and Underlay Techniques Of Myringoplasty. Pak. Armed Forces Med J. 2009;59(2):155-6.

Shea JJ Jr. Vein graft closure of eardrum perforations. J Laryngol Otol. 1960;74:358-62.

Jain S, Gupta N, Gupta R, Roy A. Interlay type 1 tympanoplasy in large central perforations: Analysis of 500 cases. IJO. 2017;23:32-5.

Kawatra R, Maheshwari P, Kumar G. A comparative study of the techniques of myringoplasty – overlay, underlay & interlay. IOSR J Dent MED Sci. 2014;13:12-6.

House WF. Myringoplasty. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1960;71:399-404.

Karlan MS. Gelatin film sandwich in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1979;87:84-6.

Juvekar MR, Jurekar RV. The double breasting technique of tympanoplasty: A study of 200 cases. Indian J Otol. 1999;5:145-8.

Kartush JM, Michaelides EM, Becvarovski Z, Larouere MJ. Over-Under Tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:802-7.

Singh M, Rai A, Bandyopadhyay S, Gupta SC. Comparative study of underlay and overlay techniques of myringoplasty in large and subtotal perforations of the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol. 2003;117(6):444-8.

Komune S, Wakizono S, Hisashi K, Uemura T, Interlay Method For Myringoplasty. Larynx Auris Nasus. 1992;19(1):17-22.

Guo M, Huang Y, Wang J. Report Of Myringoplasty with interlay method in 53 ears perforation of tympani. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 1999;13(4):147-9.

Vishal US. A One-Year Prospective Study To Evaluate The Results Of Superiorly Based Tympanomeatal Flap In Endoscopic Myringoplasty Conducted In District Hospital, Belgaum And KLES And MRC, Belgaum During July 2003 To July 2004, Dissertation, MS (ENT), RGUHS, Karnataka. 2006.

Hay A, Blanshard J, The anterior interlay myringoplasty: Outcome and hearing results in anterior and subtotal tympanic membrane perforations, Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(9):1569-76.

Patil BC, Misale PR, Mane RS, Mohite AA, Outcome Of Interlay Grafting In Type 1 Tympanoplasty For Large Central Perforation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66(4):418-24.

World Health Organization. Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media, Burden of illness and management options, WHO Child and Adolescent Health Department, Prevention of Blindness and Deafness, Geneva, 2004.

Hussain A, Yousaf N, Khan AR. Outcome of Myringoplasty. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2004;18:693-6.