DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20185299

Assessment of eustachian tube dysfunction in middle ear pathologies

T. Dinesh Singh, C. P. Sudheer

Abstract


Background: Auditory tube dysfunction is suspected as primary cause of chronic otitis media and leads to surgical related complications in otitis media with tympanic membrane perforation. The diagnosis of eustachian tube malfunction is essential to know the pathogenesis of chronic otitis media.

Methods: A total 150 cases and 75 age, sex matched control subjects between age group 20-50 years were selected. Pre and post-surgical history was noted and detailed ear examination, tympanometry was done. Auditory tube function was evaluated through Valsalva test, nasopharyngoscopy, pneumatic otoscopy. Intact tympanic membrane was assessed by Williams test, perforated tympanic membrane by Toynbee’s test.  

Results: Postoperative assessment of eustachian tube function by Toynbee’s test for 19 cases with failed tympanoplasty showed normal ET function in 5 cases, 8 cases had partial and 6 cases had gross ET dysfunction. Postoperative assessment ET function by William’s test showed 4 cases among 19 cases had partial ET dysfunction and 01 cases had gross ET dysfunction.

Conclusions: Efficient surgical outcome of middle ear complications always depends on eustachian tube function. Most of the cases with residual CP showed partial or gross ET dysfunction. Patients with tubal dysfunction should be evaluated for underlying cause and treatable causes should addressed before proceeding for surgery as it increases the success rate of tympanoplasty.


Keywords


Chronic otitis media, Eustachian tube, Retracted tympanic membrane, Toynbee’s test, William’s test

Full Text:

PDF

References


Poe DS, Gopen Q. Endoscopic diagnosis and surgery of eustachian tube dysfunction. Ch. 12. Middle ear. Ch. 25. Glasscock‑Shambaugh Surgery of the Ear. 6th ed. USA: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2010: 245‑253.

Seibert JW, Danner CJ. Eustachian tube function and the middle ear. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2006;39:1221-35.

Gupta M, Jain S, Gaurkar S, Deshmukh PT. Role of dynamic slow motion video endoscopy in etiological correlation between eustachian dysfunction and chronic otitis media: A case control study. Indian J Otol. 2015;21:19-24.

Recent advances in otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2005;194:6-160.

Adali MK, Uzun C. Comparison of effects of dry versuswet swallowing on Eustachian tube function via a nine-step inflation/deflation test. J Laryngol Otol. 2005;119:704-8.

Hidir Y, Ulus S, Karahatay S, Satar B. A comparative study on effi-ciency of middle ear pressure equalization techniques in healthyvolunteers. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011;38:450-5.

Saravanan V, Kumar RV, Vasudevan M, Vineetha K. Study of Eustachian Tube Function in Normal Adults And Those With Middle Ear Disease. IOSR-JDMS. 2017;16(5):76-80.

Bluestone CD. Pathogenesis of otitis media: role of eustachiantube. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15:281-91.

Bluestone CD, Hebda PA, Alper CM, Sando I, Buchman CH,Stangerup SE. Recent advances in otitis media. 2. Eustachian tube, middle ear, and mastoid anatomy;physiology,pathophysiology, and pathogenesis. Ann Otol Rhinol LaryngolSuppl. 2005;194:16-30.

Farrior JB. Total tympanoplasty type V. Eustachian tube patency in tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 1965;81:398‑409.

Tos M. Importance of eustachian tube function in middle ear surgery. Ear Nose Throat J. 1998;77:744‑7.

Biswas A. Eustachian tube function test: a new dimension in the management of CSOM. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;51(2):14–22.