DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20182965

Clinical assessment and follow up of post-operative outcomes in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: our experience

Mayur H. Ingale, Vinod V. Shinde, Ashutosh S. Kumar, Harsh R. Singh

Abstract


Background: Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) was the gold standard for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The objective of the study was to assess the postoperative outcomes of endoscopic DCR.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted in Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Hospital Pimpri, Pune from July 2011 to September 2013. A total of 50 patients with complaints of continuous lacrimation were included in the study. All the patients underwent endoscopic DCR and they were observed for postoperative complications and outcome.  

Results: Most of the patients were in 31-40 years age group with the mean age of 33.18 years. Female dominance was observed in the study (M:F- 1:4). Postoperative complications such as epistaxis were observed in 2 cases (4.0%), nasal synechiae in 3 cases (6.0%) and postoperative crusting in 15 cases (30.0%). In 45 (90%) patients the outcome was successful at the end of 6 months and in case of 5 (10.0%) patients it was unsuccessful.

Conclusions: The findings of the study concluded that endoscopic DCR was a simple, safe and invasive procedure as it has direct approach to the sac, produces excellent results without any external scar.


Keywords


Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy, Nasolacrimal duct obstruction, Postoperative outcome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Toti A. Nuovo metodo conservatore di cura radicale delle suppurazioni croniche del sacco lacrimale. Clin Mod Firenze. 1904;10:385-9.

Manola M, Moscillo L, Mastella A, Ferrillo B, Battiloro G, Lacerenza D. Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy(DCR): our experience. Periodic of otolaryngology, cervico-facial pathology, audiology and speech therapy. 2016;2.

Kong YT, Kim TI, Kong BW. A report of 131 cases of endoscopic laser lacrimal surgery. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(11):1793–800.

Duggal P, Mahindroo NK, Chauhan A. Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy as treatment for acute dacryocystitis with abscess formation. Am J Otolaryngol. 2008;29(3):177–9.

Tripathi A, Lesser TH, O'Donnell NP, White S. Local anaesthetic endonasal endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy: analysis of patients' acceptability and various factors affecting the success of this procedure. Eye (Lond). 2002;16(2):146–9.

David S, Raju R, Job A, Richard J. A comparative study of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: A preliminary report. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;52(1):32-7.

Hartikainen J, Anitila J, Matti V et al. Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic Dacryocysorhinostomy and external Dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:1861-6.

Weidenbecher MF, Hosemann W, Buhr W. Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 56 patients Ann Otol Rhino Laryngol. 1994;103:363-7.

Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er. Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123(4):488-91.

Onerci M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoğlu O, Irkeç M. Long term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120:319-322.