Peak nasal inspiratory flow: a comparative study in our day to day practice

Vijay Kumar; Harshvradhan .; Kranti Bhavana; Bhartendu Bharti

doi:10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20183704

Authors

Vijay Kumar Department of ENT, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India
Harshvradhan . PMCH, Patna, Bihar, India
Kranti Bhavana Department of ENT, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India
Bhartendu Bharti Department of ENT, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20183704

Keywords:

PNIF, Nasal obstruction

Abstract

Background: The peak nasal inspiratory flow is an objective measurement of nasal airway obstruction. It also helps in assessing response to treatment regardless of etiology. With this background this study was undertaken to establish diagnosis and monitoring treatment efficacy of PNIF in patients of allergic rhinitis and deviated nasal septum.

Methods: This prospective observational study involved 150 subjects who were selected among the patients attending the outpatient department of ENT and Head-Neck surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna. Thorough history was taken of all patients followed by general systemic and ENT examination. Each subject was asked to complete a SNOT 20 questionnaire. SPSS software was used for data analysis.

Results: Out of total 150 subjects, 50 had deviated nasal septum (DNS), 50 had allergic rhinitis and 50 were normal subjects. Normal subjects had mean PNIF value 80 liter per minute with a range of minimum to maximum; 60 L/min to 150 L/min. Patients with symptomatic deviated nasal septum (DNS) had mean PNIF value 50 L/min with a range 20–80 L/min. Patients with symptomatic allergic rhinitis had mean PNIF value 65 L/min with a range of minimum 40 L/min to maximum 90 L/min.

Conclusions: On OPD basis, measurements of PNIF using Youlten peak flow meter can easily suggest anatomical & pathological variations in the nose and nasal cavity and can correlated well with patient’s symptoms and severity.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Teixeira RUF, Zappelini CEM, Alves FS, da Costa EA. Peak nasal inspiratory flow evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77:473–80.

Teixeira RUF, Zappelini CEM, Oliveira LG, Basile LCG, Costa EA. Correlation Between the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow and the Visual Analogue Scale Before and After Using a Nasal Decongestant. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;15(2):156-62.

Pallanch JF, Mccaffrey TV, Kern EB. Evaluation of Nasal Breathing Function. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harher LA, Krause CJ, Shuller DE, (eds.). 2nd Ed. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. St Louis: Mosby; 1993: 1-59.

Lalwani AK, Pfister MHF. Recent Advances in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Volume 2. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd; 2013.

Ottaviano G, Scadding GK, Coles S, Lund VJ. Peak nasal inspiratory flow; normal range in adult population. Rhinology. 2006;44(1):32-5.

Starling-Schwanz R, Peake HL, Salome CM, Toelle BG, Ng KW, Marks GB, et al. repeatability of peak nasal inspiratory flow measurements and utility for assessing severity of rhinitis. Allergy. 2005:60:795-800.

Wihl JA, Malm L. Rhinomanometry and peak expiratory and inspiratory flow rate. Ann Allergy. 1988;61:50-5.

Papachristou A, Bourli E, Aivazi D, Futzila E, Papastavrou Th, konstandinidis Th, et al. normal peak nasal inspiratory flow rate values Greek children and adolescents. Hippokratia. 2008;12(2):94-102.

Fairley JW, Durham LH, Ell SR. Correlation of subjective sensation of nasal patency with nasal peal flow rate. Cliotolaryngol. 1993;18:19-22.

Rujanavej V, Snidvongs K, Chusakul S, Aeumjaturapat S. The validity of peak nasal inspiratory flow as a screening tool for nasal obstruction. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012;95(9):1205-10.

Ashan G, Drettner B, Ronge HE. A new technique for measuring nasal airflow resistance to breathing, illustrated by the effect of histamine and physical effort. Ann Acad Regiae Sci Ups. 1958;2:111–26.

Muncha SM, Tineo M, Naclerio RM, Baroody FM. Comparasion of montelukast and pseudoephedrine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery. 2006;132:164-72.

Lund VJ, Flood J, Sykes AP, Richards DH. Effect of fluticasone in severe polyposis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(5):513-8.

Andre RF, Vuyk HD, Ahmed A, Graamans K, Nolst Trenite GJ. Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway: a systemic review of the highest level of evidence. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;34(6):518-25.

Tantilipikorn P, Vichyanand P, Lacroix JS. Nasal provocation test: how to maximize its clinical use? Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2010;28(4):225-31.

Holmstrom M, Scadding GK, Lund VJ, Darby YC. Assessment of nasal obstruction. A comparison between rhinomanometry and nasal inspiratory peak flow. Rhinology. 1990;28:191-6.