DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20182718

Endoscopic DCR with and without prolene stent in rural area: a prospective randomized study

Abhay Kumar, Prateek Kumar Porwal, Kailash Prasad Dubey, Harshita Singh

Abstract


Background: The objective of the study was to compare the results of endoscopic DCR with and without prolene stenting and to assess subjective and anatomical success in patients undergoing prolene stenting.

Methods: The surgical outcomes of endoscopic endonasal DCR was compared in 100 patients of chronic dacryocystitis with nasolacrimal duct obstruction from June 2013 to May 2018. The successful outcome of surgery was defined by subjective improvement of symptoms and anatomical patency of the neo-ostium on syringing by nasal endoscopy.  

Results: In our study females were predominant in both groups with around 60% being females in group with stenting and 64% in group without stenting. Male to female ratio was 1:1.5 and 1:1.77 in group with stenting and without stenting. The symptomatic success rate of the surgery at the end of 3 months was 92% in group without stenting and 88% in group with stenting. There was no statistical difference in the results of two groups.

Conclusions: We recommend that stenting is not routinely required for endoscopic DCR surgeries. A selective stenting approach may be advocated using prolene 3-0, using stenting for specific indications. With proper surgical technique and good follow up, endoscopic DCR without stenting is treatment of choice for chronic nasolacrimal duct obstruction.


Keywords


Endonasal DCR, Chronic dacryocystitis, Prolene stent, Nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chandler PA. Dacryocystorhinostomy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1936;34:240-63.

Stammberger H. Endoscopic endonasal surgery-- concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part I. Anatomic and pathophysiologic considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;94(2):143-7.

McDonogh M, Meiring JH. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol. 1989;103(6):585-7.

Metson R, Woog JJ, Puliafito CA. Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy. The Laryngoscope. 1994;104(3):269-74.

Kominek P, Cervenka S, Novak V. Intubation of the lacrimal pathways under endoscopic control. Ophthalmologica. 2000;214(6):381-4.

Mantynen J, Yoshitsugu M, Rautiainen M. Results of dacryocystorhinostomy in 96 patients. Acta otolaryngol Suppl. 1997;529:187-9.

Allen K, Berlin AJ. Dacryocystorhinostomy failure: association with nasolacrimal silicone intubation. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989;20(7):486-9.

Okuyucu S, Gorur H, Oksuz H, Akoglu E. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone, polypropylene, and T-tube stents; randomized controlled trial of efficacy and safety. Am J Rhinol Allerg. 2015;29(1):63-8.

Naik SM, Mushannavar AS, Ravishankara S, Appaji MK, Goutham M, Devi NP, et al. Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy done with and without Silicon Tube Stents: A Comparative Case Series Analysis Study. Head Neck Surg. 2012;3(3):147-53.

Mortimore S, Banhegy GY, Lancaster JL, Karkanevatos A. Endoscopic dacryocysto-rhinostomy without silicone stenting. J Royal Coll Surg Edinburgh. 1999;44(6):371-3.

Unlu HH, Toprak B, Aslan A, Guler C. Comparison of surgical outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111(8):704-9.

Cheng S-M, Feng Y-F, Xu L, Li Y, Huang J-H. Efficacy of Mitomycin C in Endoscopic Dacryo-cystorhinostomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e62737.

Fayet B, Bernard JA, Assouline M, Benabderrazik S, Pouliquen Y. Bicanalicular versus mono-canalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct impatency in children: A comparative study. Orbit. 1993;12(3):149-56.

Aslan S, Oksuz H, Okuyucu S, Akoglu E, Dagli S. Prolene: a novel, cheap, and effective material in dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129(7):755-9.